Volume 7, Issue 3 (7-2013)                   Qom Univ Med Sci J 2013, 7(3): 35-42 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Bazzazi N, Akbarzadeh S, Torabian S, Taghizadeh M. Comparison of the Accuracy of Intraocular Pressure Measurement by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and Keeler Noncontact Tonometer. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2013; 7 (3) :35-42
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-144-en.html
1- Hamadan University of Medical Sciences , n_bazzazi@yahoo.com
2- Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
Abstract:   (5142 Views)

Background and Objectives: Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of blindness, and its major risk factor is elevated intraocular pressure. Intraocular pressure measurement is a major examination in patients with glaucoma for diagnosis and treatment follow-up. This study was carried out with the purpose of comparing the accuracy of two types of conventional tonometers for measuring intraocular pressure.   Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, after complete ophthalmologic examinations, intraocular pressure was measured in 142 patients (284 eyes), two times at 5-minute intervals using both Goldmann and Keeler tonometers. The obtained results were analyzed with paired t-test and Pearson’s correlation test.   Results: Mean intraocular pressure in subjects that were in normal pressure range (<21mmHg) was obtained 14.03±2.35mmHg with Goldmann tonometer, and 14.28±3.05mmHg with Keeler tonometer. The mean difference of the two methods was 0.25±0.70 (p=0.015) and the correlation coefficient between two methods was calculated 0.83 (p<0.0001). Mean intraocular pressure in high intraocular pressure range (³21mmHg) was obtained 26.16±5.1mmHg with Goldmann tonometer, and 26.92±5.58mmHg with Keeler tonometer. The mean difference of the two methods was 0.76±0.44 (p=0.003), and correlation coefficient between two methods was calculated 0.97 (p<0.0001).   Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, both used tonometry methods had acceptable accuracy in normal intraocular pressure range, but in high-risk cases such as glaucoma, Goldmann applanation tonometer is preferred as the gold standard.

Full-Text [PDF 186 kb]   (3358 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article |
Received: 2016/02/13 | Accepted: 2016/02/23 | Published: 2016/02/23

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Qom University of Medical Sciences Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb