Select one issue to see the articles
Back to the articles list |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.UMA.REC.1401.066
1- University of Mohaghegh Ardabili , hajloo53@uma.ac.ir
2- Urmia University
3- Shahid Beheshti University
4- University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
2- Urmia University
3- Shahid Beheshti University
4- University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
Abstract: (1472 Views)
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the psychometric properties of emotion regulation strategies scale (Heidelberg Form) (HFERST).
Methods: The statistical population of the present study included all people aged 18 to 60 years in the period from November to December 2022. The statistical sample of the study included 333 people who were selected by available sampling method through online call. In order to evaluate the convergent and divergent validity, the second version of the Acceptance and Practice Questionnaire (AAQ - II), the difficulty in emotion regulation scale (DERS-16) and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress (DASS-21) scale were used. Reliability was performed using Cronbach's alpha method and retesting and analyzing the data with version 25 of SPSS software and version 8.8 of LISREL.
Results: The results of confirmatory factor analysis, as in the original form, confirmed Four factors: psychological, psychological, economic and social. Also, Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the subscales of Rumination, reappraisal, acceptance, problem solving, suppression of emotional expression, suppression of emotional experiences, avoidance and social support were equal to 0.88, 0.87, 0.90, 0.91, 0.84, 0.89, 0.92 and 0.90, respectively. In addition, the four-week retest coefficient for the mentioned subscales were equal to 0.83, 0.80, 0.85, 0.89, 0.80, 0.82, 0.86 and 0.91, respectively.
Conclusion: According to the obtained results, it can be said that the emotion regulation strategies scale (Heidelberg Form) (HFERST) is a reliable and valid scale for measuring emotion regulation strategies.
Methods: The statistical population of the present study included all people aged 18 to 60 years in the period from November to December 2022. The statistical sample of the study included 333 people who were selected by available sampling method through online call. In order to evaluate the convergent and divergent validity, the second version of the Acceptance and Practice Questionnaire (AAQ - II), the difficulty in emotion regulation scale (DERS-16) and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress (DASS-21) scale were used. Reliability was performed using Cronbach's alpha method and retesting and analyzing the data with version 25 of SPSS software and version 8.8 of LISREL.
Results: The results of confirmatory factor analysis, as in the original form, confirmed Four factors: psychological, psychological, economic and social. Also, Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the subscales of Rumination, reappraisal, acceptance, problem solving, suppression of emotional expression, suppression of emotional experiences, avoidance and social support were equal to 0.88, 0.87, 0.90, 0.91, 0.84, 0.89, 0.92 and 0.90, respectively. In addition, the four-week retest coefficient for the mentioned subscales were equal to 0.83, 0.80, 0.85, 0.89, 0.80, 0.82, 0.86 and 0.91, respectively.
Conclusion: According to the obtained results, it can be said that the emotion regulation strategies scale (Heidelberg Form) (HFERST) is a reliable and valid scale for measuring emotion regulation strategies.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
روانشناسی
Received: 2022/12/27 | Accepted: 2023/01/15 | Published: 2023/01/1
Received: 2022/12/27 | Accepted: 2023/01/15 | Published: 2023/01/1
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
