Volume 19, Issue 1 (3-2025)                   Qom Univ Med Sci J 2025, 19(1): 24-37 | Back to browse issues page

Research code: 981071
Ethics code: IR.MUQ.REC.1399.092


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Raisi M, Eskandari N, Ahmari Tehran H, Bakouie S, Jafarbegloo E, Khaki I. Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale –Revised (BSS-R) for Persian-speaking Foreign Women living in Iran. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2025; 19 (1) : 352.2
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-4044-en.html
1- Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
2- Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran. , neskandari@muq.ac.ir
3- Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 5238 kb]   (298 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (912 Views)
Full-Text:   (700 Views)
Introduction
Birth satisfaction and its assessment have been increasingly considered owing to their effect on childbearing intention and choosing the labor method. Women who are dissatisfied with their childbirth experience, since they remember pain, fear, or sadness during the birth of their child, suffer from complications such as postpartum anxiety and depression, decreased ability to breastfeed, miscarriage in subsequent pregnancies, decreased sexual ability, and inappropriate behavior toward the child [2]. Currently, various scales are available to assess satisfaction with childbirth and its care, including the birth satisfaction scale-revised (BSS-R), a 10-item scale developed by Hollins Martin and Fleming (2011) [15]. The present study aimed to translate and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the BSS-R for Persian-speaking foreign women living in Qom, Iran.
Methods
This is a psychometric study with a cross-sectional design, conducted with the participation of Persian-speaking foreign women residing in Qom. The BSS-R was first translated into Persian. Then, its psychometric properties, including face validity, content validity, construct validity, and reliability, were examined. The face validity was determined based on the opinions of 15 women. The content validity was determined based on the opinions of 10 experts. The confirmatory factor analysis was performed in LISREL to examine the construct validity. Due to the lack of model fit, the data were transferred to SPSS software, version 21, and exploratory factor analysis (principal component analysis method) was utilized to extract the factors. Cronbach’s α coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were utilized to determine the reliability of the Persian version.
Results
Most of the women were housewives with less than a high school diploma, had low incomes, lived in rented houses with their husbands, and were satisfied with their lives. One item during the assessment of formal validity and three items during the assessment of content validity were revised. In assessing the construct validity using the exploratory factor analysis, KMO was obtained as 0.678, and Bartlett’s sphericity test was significant (P<0.001). Seven terms with commonalities (factor loading) ≥0.4 were kept as suitable items. According to the results of the scree plot, three factors (personnel communication, labor pain/stress, and labor length) were determined, explaining 71.285% of the cumulative changes in the variance of BSS-R. The internal consistency using Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.48 for the entire scale. Also, ICC was 0.166 for the entire scale, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.361, but it was not statistically significant.
Conclusion
According to data analysis, the Persian version of BSS-R with seven items has sufficient validity to measure birth satisfaction in Persian-speaking foreign women living in Iran, but has poor reliability. Therefore, further modifications and studies are recommended to evaluate the reliability of this tool for other populations in Iran.
Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qom University of Medical Sciences, Iran (code: IR.MUQ.REC.1399.092). Informed consent was obtained from all participants after providing comprehensive information about the study objectives and methods. Their voluntary participation, anonymity, and the right to leave the study were considered. 
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for profit sectors.
Authors contributions
All authors contributed equally to the conception and design of the study, data collection and analysis, interpretation of the results, and drafting of the manuscript. Each author approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all women who participated in this study for their cooperation.
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: مامایی
Received: 2024/11/24 | Accepted: 2025/05/26 | Published: 2025/03/30

References
1. Jafari E, Mohebbi P, Rastegari L, Mazloomzadeh S. [The comparison of physiologic and routine method of delivery in mother's satisfaction level in Ayatollah Mosavai Hospital, Zanjan, Iran. 2012 (Persian)]. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2013; 16(73):9-18. [DOI:10.22038/ijogi.2013.1949]
2. Dolatian M, Sayyahi F, Khoda Karami N, Simbar M. [Satisfaction rate of normal vaginal delivery and its relative factors among childbearing women in Mahdiye, Tehran and Shaheed Chamran, Boroujerd hospitals (Persian)]. Pajouhandeh J. 2008; 13(3):259-68. [Link]
3. Nilvér H, Begley C, Berg M. Measuring women's childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(1):203. [DOI:10.1186/s12884-017-1356-y] [PMID] [DOI:10.1186/s12884-017-1356-y]
4. Bitew K, Ayichiluhm M, Yimam K. Maternal satisfaction on delivery service and its associated factors among mothers who gave birth in public health facilities of Debre Markos town, Northwest Ethiopia. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:460767. [DOI:10.1155/2015/460767] [PMID] [DOI:10.1155/2015/460767]
5. Asres GD. Satisfaction and associated factors among mothers delivered at Asrade Zewude Memorial Primary Hospital, Bure, West Gojjam, Amhara, Ethiopia: A cross sectional study. Prim Health Care. 2018; 8(2):1000293. [DOI:10.4172/2167-1079.1000293] [DOI:10.4172/2167-1079.1000293]
6. Kifle MM, Ghirmai FA, Berhe SA, Tesfay WS, Weldegebriel YT, Gebrehiwet ZT. Predictors of women's satisfaction with hospital-based intrapartum care in Asmara public hospitals, eritrea. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2017; 2017:3717408.[DOI:10.1155/2017/3717408] [PMID] [DOI:10.1155/2017/3717408]
7. Ghanbari-Homayi S, Fardiazar Z, Meedya S, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Mohammadi E, et al. Predictors of traumatic birth experience among a group of Iranian primipara women: A cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19(1):182. [DOI:10.1186/s12884-019-2333-4] [PMID] [DOI:10.1186/s12884-019-2333-4]
8. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med. 2015; 12(6):e1001847; discussion e1001847. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847] [PMID] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847]
9. Mortazavi F, Mehrabadi M, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Psychometric properties of the birth satisfaction scale-revised (BSS-R) in a Sample of Postpartum Iranian Women. Health Care Women Int. 2021; 42(4-6):836-51. [DOI:10.1080/07399332.2020.1802464] [PMID] [DOI:10.1080/07399332.2020.1802464]
10. Bertucci V, Boffo M, Mannarini S, Serena A, Saccardi C, Cosmi E, et al. Assessing the perception of the childbirth experience in Italian women: A contribution to the adaptation of the Childbirth Perception Questionnaire. Midwifery. 2012; 28(2):265-74. [DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2011.02.009] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2011.02.009]
11. Gungor I, Beji NK. Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and caesarean birth. Midwifery. 2012; 28(3):348-57. [DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.009] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.009]
12. Moudi Z, Tavousi M. Evaluation of Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale in Iran: What are the psychometric properties? Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2016; 5(2):e29952. [DOI:10.17795/nmsjournal29952] [PMID] [DOI:10.17795/nmsjournal29952]
13. Horsan H, Fathnejad Kazemi A, Sharifi N. Masjoudi M. [The psychometric properties of the Iranian Version of Postpartum Satisfaction Nursing Care Questionnaire (Persian]. Iran J Nurs. 2016; 28(98):67-78. [DOI:10.29252/ijn.28.98.67] [DOI:10.29252/ijn.28.98.67]
14. Martin CH, Fleming V. The birth satisfaction scale. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011; 24(2):124-35. [DOI:10.1108/09526861111105086] [PMID] [DOI:10.1108/09526861111105086]
15. Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2014; 30(6):610-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006]
16. Škodová Z, Nepelová Z, Grendár M, Bašková M. Psychometric properties of the Slovak version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale (BSS) and Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2019; 79:102550. [DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2019.102550] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2019.102550]
17. Barbosa-Leiker C, Fleming S, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) for US mothers. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2015; 33(5):504-11. [DOI:10.1080/02646838.2015.1024211] [DOI:10.1080/02646838.2015.1024211]
18. Fleming SE, Donovan-Batson C, Burduli E, Barbosa-Leiker C, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Birth Satisfaction Scale/Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS/ BSS-R): A large scale United States planned home birth and birth centre survey. Midwifery. 2016; 41:9-15. [DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2016.07.008] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2016.07.008]
19. Nespoli A, Colciago E, Pedroni S, Perego S, Fumagalli S. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R): Process of translation and adaptation in an Italian context. Ann Ist Super Sanità. 2018; 54(4):340-7. [PMID]
20. Romero-Gonzalez B, Peralta-Ramirez MI, Caparros-Gonzalez RA, Cambil-Ledesma A, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Spanish validation and factor structure of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2019; 70:31-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.009] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.009]
21. Vivilaki VG, Zemperligkou E, Iliopoulou E, Anastasopoulou E, Giaxi P, Lykeridou K. The reversed birth satisfaction scale: Translation, adaptation and validation for a Greek sample. Eur J Midwifery. 2017; 1(September):3 [DOI:10.18332/ejm/76655] [DOI:10.18332/ejm/76655]
22. Göncü Serhatlıoğlu S, Karahan N, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Construct and content validity of the Turkish Birth Satisfaction Scale - Revised (T-BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2018; 36(3):235-45. [DOI:10.1080/02646838.2018.1443322] [PMID] [DOI:10.1080/02646838.2018.1443322]
23. Belanger-Levesque MN, Pasquier M, Roy-Matton N, Blouin S, Pasquier JC. Maternal and paternal satisfaction in the delivery room: A cross-sectional comparative study. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(2):e004013. [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004013] [PMID] [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004013]
24. Hinic KA. The relationships among perceived stress, birth satisfaction, and breastfeeding self-efficacy in early postpartum women [PhD dissertation]. New Jersey: Seton Hall University; 2015. [Link]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Qom University of Medical Sciences Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb