1. Van Ryzin GG. Pieces of a puzzle: Linking government performance, citizen satisfaction, and trust. Public Perform Manage Rev. 2007; 30(4):521-35. [DOI:10.2753/PMR1530-9576300403] [
DOI:10.2753/PMR1530-9576300403]
2. Badri M, Al Khaili M, Al Mansoori RL. Quality of service, expectation, satisfaction and trust in public institutions: the Abu Dhabi citizen satisfaction survey. Asian J Polit Sci. 2015; 23(3):420-47. [DOI:10.1080/02185377.2015.1055773] [
DOI:10.1080/02185377.2015.1055773]
3. Del Pino E, Calzada I, Díaz‐Pulido JM. Conceptualizing and explaining bureauphobia: Contours, scope, and determinants. Public Adm Rev. 2016; 76(5):725-36. [DOI:10.1111/puar.12570] [
DOI:10.1111/puar.12570]
4. Peeters R, Nieto-Morales F. The Inequality Machine: An exploration of the costs and causes of bureaucratic dysfunction in Mexico. Dev Adm. 2021; 3:19-30. [DOI:10.46996/dina.v3i1.5807] [
DOI:10.46996/dina.v3i1.5807]
5. Cremades Guisado Á, Cancelado Franco H. Intelligence as a bureaucratic organization: Dysfunctions of the Weberian model. Revista Científica General José María Córdova. 2021; 19(34):479-496. [DOI:10.21830/19006586.677] [
DOI:10.21830/19006586.677]
6. Canton J, Scott KM, Glue P. Optimal treatment of social phobia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2012; 8:203-15. [DOI:10.2147/NDT.S23317] [PMID] [PMCID] [
DOI:10.2147/NDT.S23317]
7. Goodsell CT. The new case for bureaucracy. London: SAGE; 2015. [DOI:10.4135/9781483395739] [
DOI:10.4135/9781483395739]
8. Marvel JD, Resh WG. Bureaucratic discretion, client demographics, and representative bureaucracy. Am Rev Public Adm. 2015; 45(3):281-310. [DOI:10.1177/0275074013492008] [
DOI:10.1177/0275074013492008]
9. Vigoda-Gadot E, Shoham A, Vashdi DR. Bridging bureaucracy and democracy in Europe: A comparative study of perceived managerial excellence, satisfaction with public services, and trust in governance. European :union: Politics. 2010; 11(2):289-308. [DOI:10.1177/1465116510363657] [
DOI:10.1177/1465116510363657]
10. Kaufman H. Fear of bureaucracy: A raging pandemic. Public Adm Rev. 1981; 41(1):1-9. [DOI:10.2307/975718] [
DOI:10.2307/975718]
11. Berman EM. Dealing with cynical citizens. In: Local Government Management: Current Issues and Best Practices. London: Routledge; 2003. [Link]
12. Amiri m, Pourezzat A, Jafari D, Hashemi S. [In search of the Iranian bureaucracy (Persian)]. Surah. 2011; (54-55):124-30. [Link]
13. Farzadi F, Mafton F, Aeeinparast A, Azin A , Sepideh O, Katayoun J, et al. Determinants of satisfaction with health care system: a population-based study from Iran (Persian)]. Payesh. 2011; 10(3):323-30. [DOI: 20.1001.1.16807626.1390.10.3.2.1]
14. Rouhafza M, Adhami Moghadam F, Sahebalzamani M. [Assessment the relationship between patient satisfaction and quality of hospital services based on SERVQUAL Model in the hospitals related to Islamic Azad University, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch in 2015 (Persian)]. Med Sci. 2016; 26(3):173-79. [Link]
15. Ansari H, Ebadi fard F, Mollasadeghi G. [Patient satisfaction in hospitals under the auspices of Iran University of Medical Sciences (Persian)]. Birjand Univ Med Sci. 2004; 11(3):38-45. [Link]
16. Salehikordabadi S, Rezaei M, kelidbari H. [Study of service quality and customers satisfaction in governmental organizations (case study of Gilan province) (Persian)]. Police Human Dev. 2010; 7(33):61-86. [Link]
17. Mosaei M, Fatemi M, Nikbin F. [Investigating the factors and strategies for observing patient rights (Persian)]. J Soc Welf. 2010; 10(39):55-84. [Link]
18. Feizi A, Mohammadi R, Nikravesh M. [Factors Causing Patient's Trust in Nurse from Patients' Perspective (Persian)]. RJMS. 2006; 13(52):177-187. [Link]
19. Zaboli R, seyedjavadi M, salari J, aliaffje A. [A Survey on the Extent and Causes of Patients Complaints in Hospitals and Medical Centers Affiliated of Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (Persian)]. Iran J Forensic Med. 2014; 20(4):193-200. [Link]
20. Barnum H, Kutzin J. Public hospitals in developing countries: Resource use, cost, financing. London: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1993. [Link]
21. Roulston K, Choi M. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection. London: SAGE; 2018. [Link]
22. Ranjbar H, Haghdost A, Salsali M, Khoshdel A. [Sampling in qualitative research: A guide to getting started (Persian)]. Ann Milhealth Sci Res. 2012; 10(3):238-50. [Link]
23. King N, Horrocks C, Brooks J. Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage; 2019. [Link]
24. AbediJafari H, Taslimi M, Faghihi A, Shikh M. Theme and theme network analysis: A simple and efficient method for explaining patterns in qualitative data (Persian)]. Strateg Manage Thought. 2011; 5(2):151-98. [Link]
25. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. USA: Jossey-Bass; 1981. [Link]
26. Goodsell CT. The case for bureaucracy: A public administration polemic. New Jersey: Chatham House; 1994. [Link]
27. Molavi Z, Tahmasebi R, Danaei Fardeh H, Hamidi A. [Bureauphobia: The ambivalentl look of citizens on public services (Persian)]. J Public Adm. 2017; 9(2):213-34. [DOI:10.22059/jipa.2017.240217.2078]
28. Frederickson HG. The spirit of public administration. USA: Jossey-Bass; 1997. [Link]
29. Tyler TR. Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from the law and legal institutions? Behav Sci Law. 2001; 19(2):215-35. [DOI:10.1002/bsl.438] [PMID] [
DOI:10.1002/bsl.438]
30. Goel S, Mason W, Watts DJ. Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks. J Pers Soc Psych. 2010; 99(4):611. [DOI:10.1037/a0020697] [PMID] [
DOI:10.1037/a0020697]