Volume 15, Issue 4 (July 2021)
Qom Univ Med Sci J 2021, 15(4): 296-305 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Zanjani F, Mohammad Khan Kermanshahi S, Gholami Fesharaki M. The Effect of Health Promotion Support Program on Quality of Life in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2021; 15 (4) :296-305
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-3123-en.html
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-3123-en.html
1- Department of Nursing, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Nursing, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. ,kerman-s@modares.ac.ir
3- Department of Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Nursing, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. ,
3- Department of Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (2378 Views)
Background and Objectives: Diabetics need to improve their lifestyle. They should control and prevent the complications of diabetes to improve their quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the effect of health promotion support programs on the quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Methods: The present study was a quasi-clinical trial. A total of 60 people were selected by convenience sampling method and then divided purposefully into intervention (n= 30) and control (n= 30) groups. The health promotion support program was implemented in three stages: review and recognition, support planning, and evaluation. The study data were collected by Demographic and Quality of Life Questionnaire of diabetic patients (DQOL-BCI) before and two months after the intervention in the experimental and control groups.
Results: The difference between the two groups regarding gender, age, marriage, education, and the job was not significant. The Mean±SD score of quality of life in the intervention group before the intervention was 46.8±8.06 and increased after the intervention to 56.8±6.06 (P <0.001). The Mean±SD score of quality of life in the control group before the intervention was 46.9±6.7 and increased after the intervention to 49.7±5.6, and this difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The increase in the quality of life score of the intervention group was 10 units, but it was 2.87 units in the control group. Before the intervention, the difference in the quality of life scores of the two groups was not significant (the independent t-test, P=0.98), but after the intervention, this difference was significant (the independent t-test, P<0.001).
Conclusion: The results showed that implementing a health promotion support program effectively improved the quality of life of type 2 diabetic patients. Therefore, it is suggested to be used as an effective method in improving the quality of life of diabetic patients and other chronic diseases.
Methods: The present study was a quasi-clinical trial. A total of 60 people were selected by convenience sampling method and then divided purposefully into intervention (n= 30) and control (n= 30) groups. The health promotion support program was implemented in three stages: review and recognition, support planning, and evaluation. The study data were collected by Demographic and Quality of Life Questionnaire of diabetic patients (DQOL-BCI) before and two months after the intervention in the experimental and control groups.
Results: The difference between the two groups regarding gender, age, marriage, education, and the job was not significant. The Mean±SD score of quality of life in the intervention group before the intervention was 46.8±8.06 and increased after the intervention to 56.8±6.06 (P <0.001). The Mean±SD score of quality of life in the control group before the intervention was 46.9±6.7 and increased after the intervention to 49.7±5.6, and this difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The increase in the quality of life score of the intervention group was 10 units, but it was 2.87 units in the control group. Before the intervention, the difference in the quality of life scores of the two groups was not significant (the independent t-test, P=0.98), but after the intervention, this difference was significant (the independent t-test, P<0.001).
Conclusion: The results showed that implementing a health promotion support program effectively improved the quality of life of type 2 diabetic patients. Therefore, it is suggested to be used as an effective method in improving the quality of life of diabetic patients and other chronic diseases.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
غدد
Received: 2021/05/1 | Accepted: 2021/07/31 | Published: 2021/08/1
Received: 2021/05/1 | Accepted: 2021/07/31 | Published: 2021/08/1
References
1. Jamshidi L. Educational needs of diabetic patients whom referred to the diabetes center. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012; 31:450-3. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.084] [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.084]
2. Alaofè H, Asaolu I, Ehiri J, Moretz H, Asuzu C, Balogun M, et al. Community health workers in diabetes prevention and management in developing countries. Ann Glob Health. 2017; 83(3-4):661-75. [DOI:10.1016/j.aogh.2017.10.009] [DOI:10.1016/j.aogh.2017.10.009]
3. Mohmed J, Palreddy RR, Gunda SK, Purohith DJ, Shaik M. Quinazolinone derivatives as growth hormone secretagogue receptor inhibitors: 3D-QSAR study. Int J ChemTech Res. 2016; 9(5):896-903. https://sphinxsai.com/2016/ch_vol9_no5/3/(896-903)V9N5CT.pdf
4. Hinkle JL, Cheever KH. Brunner & Suddarth's textbook of medical-surgical nursing. Gurugaon: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd; 2018. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Brunner_and_Suddarth_s_Textbook_of_Medic/yS7vDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0
5. Green AJ, Fox KM, Grandy S. Self-reported hypoglycemia and impact on quality of life and depression among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012; 96(3):313-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2012.01.002] [DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2012.01.002]
6. Mokhtari Z, Gheshlagh RG, Kurdi A. Health-related quality of life in Iranian patients with type 2 diabetes: An updated meta-analysis . Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. 2019; 13(1):402-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2018.10.007] [DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2018.10.007]
7. Asif M. The prevention and control the type-2 diabetes by changing lifestyle and dietary pattern. J Educ Health Promot. 2014; 3:1. [DOI:10.4103/2277-9531.127541] [PMID] [DOI:10.4103/2277-9531.127541]
8. Abdolalizadeh M, Kermanshahi S. [The effect of a supportive health promotion program on the quality of life of mothers of premature newborns (Persian)]. Evid Based Care J. 2015; 5(2):37-48. [DOI:10.4103/2277-9531.127541] [DOI:10.4103/2277-9531.127541]
9. Rakhshani T, Shojaiezadeh D, Bagheri Lankarani K, Rakhshani F, Kaveh MH, Zare N. The association of health-promoting lifestyle with quality of life among the Iranian elderly. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014; 16(9):e18404. [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.5812/ircmj.18404]
10. Heydari A, Khorashadizadeh F. Pender's health promotion model in medical research. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014; 64(9):1067-74. [PMID]
11. Vaccaro JA, Exebio JC, Zarini GG, Huffman FG. The role of family / friend social support in diabetes self-management for minorities with type 2 Diabetes. J Nutr Health. 2014; 2(1):1-9. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=dietetics_nutrition_fac
12. Ghiyasvandian Sh, Salimi A, Navid Hamidi M, Ebrahimi H. [Assessing the effect of self-management education on quality of life of patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (Persian)]. Knowl Health. 2017; 12(1):50-6. [DOI:10.22100/jkh.v12i1.1522]
13. Fathi Ahmadsaraei N, Neshat Doost HT, Manshaee GR, Nadi MA. [The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on quality of life among patients with type 2 Diabetes (Persian)]. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2016; 4(1):31-9. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.ihepsaj.4.1.31] [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.ihepsaj.4.1.31]
14. Heidari F, Mohammad Khan Kermanshahi S, Vanaki Z. [The effect of a supportive health promotion program on the lifestyle of premenopause teachers (Persian)]. Feyz. 2013; 17(1):14-24. http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-1874-en.html
15. Kadirvelu A, Sadasivan S, Ng SH. Social support in type II diabetes care: A case of too little, too late. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2012; 5:407-17. [DOI:10.2147/DMSO.S37183] [DOI:10.2147/DMSO.S37183]
16. Fisher BE, Boothroyd IR, Coufal MM, Baumann CL, Mbanya JC, Rotheram-Borus MJ, et al. Peer support for self management of diabetes improved outcomes in international settings. Health Aff. 2012; 31(1):130-9. [DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0914] [DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0914]
17. Khavasi M, Shamsizadeh M, Varaei S, Rezaei M, Elhami S, Masroor D. [The effect of peer education on diabetes quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial (Persian)]. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care. 2017; 25(3):9-16. http://nmj.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-1688-fa.html
18. Mendoza-Núñez VM, Flores-Bello C, Correa-Muñoz E, Retana-U Galde R, Ruiz-Ramos M. Relationship between social support networks and diabetes control and its impact on the quality of life in older community-dwelling Mexicans. Nutr Hosp. 2016; 33(6):1312-6. [DOI:10.20960/nh.776] [PMID] [DOI:10.20960/nh.776]
19. Koetsenruijter J, van Lieshout J, Vassilev I, Portillo MC, Serrano M, Knutsen I, et al. Social support systems as determinants of self-management and quality of life of people with diabetes across Europe: Study protocol for an observational study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014; 12:29. [DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-12-29] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-12-29]
20. Rashidi K, Safavi M, Yahyavi SH, Farahani H. [The effect of the peers' support on self efficacy level type II diabetic patients (Persian)]. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care. 2015; 23(3):15-26. http://nmj.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-1262-fa.html
21. Rudsari Daryadokht M, Ashrafi Z, Parsa Yekta Z, Haghani H. [Evaluation of quality of life among diabetic patients (type II) (Persian)]. Knowl Health. 2015; 10(1):58-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2012.01.002] [DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2012.01.002]
22. Zareipour, MA, Jadgal KM, Zare F, Valizadeh R, Ghelichi Ghojogh M. [The relationship between perceived stress and blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (Persian)]. Rahavard Salamat J. 2017; 2(4):1-13. http://rsj.iums.ac.ir/article-1-52-en.html
23. Sopjani I, Vehapi Sh, Gorani D, Imeri M, Vitoja S, Tahiri Sh. The relation between depressive symptoms and self-care in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 in Kosovo. Med Arch. 2016; 70(6):425-8. [DOI:10.5455/medarh.2016.70.425-428] [DOI:10.5455/medarh.2016.70.425-428]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Owned by Qom University of Medical Sciences
Published by Qom University of Medical Sciences Press
eISSN: 2008-1375
pISSN: 1735-7799
Email: journal[at]muq.ac.ir
j.mua.ac[at]gmail.com
