Volume 19, Issue 1 (3-2025)
Qom Univ Med Sci J 2025, 19(1): 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Research code: A-10-3011-1
Ethics code: IR.ABZUMS.REC.1401.297
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Kamalinia M, Zahrakar K, Arabzadeh M. Developing a Structural Equation Model of Resilience Based on Cognitive Emotion Regulation With the Mediating Role of Marital Adjustment. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2025; 19 (1) : 3011.2
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-3986-en.html
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-3986-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human Science, Saveh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran.
2- Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran. ,dr_zahrakar@khu.ac.ir
3- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran.
2- Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran. ,
3- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran.
Abstract: (580 Views)
Background and Objectives: Resilience is known as a component that plays an important role in tolerating the hardships of the occupational and marital environment. Therefore, it is identified as the main construct of personality, so identifying variables that can predict resilience is important.
Methods: The present study is based on the basic purpose and in terms of the method of collecting descriptive data is correlational with structural equation model. The statistical population of the study included married female nurses in public health centers and hospitals of Alborz Province that 400 of them were selected by multistage cluster sampling method. To analyze the data, structural equation modeling test and SPSS software, version 26 and Amos software, version 24 were used.
Results: The critical ratio between cognitive emotion regulation (r=0.729, P>0.01) and marital adjustment (r=0.796, P>0.01) with resilience was positive and significant at the 0.01 level. The correlation between cognitive emotion regulation (r=0.744, P>0.01) and marital adjustment (r=0.856, P>0.01) with resilience was positive and significant. Also, the critical ratio between cognitive emotion regulation (r=0.729) and marital adjustment (r=0.796) with resilience was positive and significant at the 0.01 level.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it is suggested to the officials of the treatment staff to pay special attention to cognitive, emotional and emotional variables of this group to increase the resilience of married female nurses. The critical ratio between cognitive emotion regulation (r=0.729.), marital adjustment (r=0.796) and resiliency was found at the significance level of 0.01. The results showed that the data fit with the conceptual model of the research. Also, the mediating role of marital adjustment, between cognitive flexibility, self-differentiation and the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire on resilience was confirmed. According to the results, to increase the resilience of married female nurses, it is recommended to pay special attention to cognitive, emotional and emotional variables of this class.
Methods: The present study is based on the basic purpose and in terms of the method of collecting descriptive data is correlational with structural equation model. The statistical population of the study included married female nurses in public health centers and hospitals of Alborz Province that 400 of them were selected by multistage cluster sampling method. To analyze the data, structural equation modeling test and SPSS software, version 26 and Amos software, version 24 were used.
Results: The critical ratio between cognitive emotion regulation (r=0.729, P>0.01) and marital adjustment (r=0.796, P>0.01) with resilience was positive and significant at the 0.01 level. The correlation between cognitive emotion regulation (r=0.744, P>0.01) and marital adjustment (r=0.856, P>0.01) with resilience was positive and significant. Also, the critical ratio between cognitive emotion regulation (r=0.729) and marital adjustment (r=0.796) with resilience was positive and significant at the 0.01 level.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it is suggested to the officials of the treatment staff to pay special attention to cognitive, emotional and emotional variables of this group to increase the resilience of married female nurses. The critical ratio between cognitive emotion regulation (r=0.729.), marital adjustment (r=0.796) and resiliency was found at the significance level of 0.01. The results showed that the data fit with the conceptual model of the research. Also, the mediating role of marital adjustment, between cognitive flexibility, self-differentiation and the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire on resilience was confirmed. According to the results, to increase the resilience of married female nurses, it is recommended to pay special attention to cognitive, emotional and emotional variables of this class.
Article number: 3011.2
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
پرستاری-روانپرستاری
Received: 2024/07/21 | Accepted: 2024/11/13 | Published: 2025/03/30
Received: 2024/07/21 | Accepted: 2024/11/13 | Published: 2025/03/30
References
1. Beckman CM, Stanko TL. It takes three: Relational boundary work, resilience, and commitment among navy couples. Acad Manage J. 2020; 63(2):411-39. [DOI:10.5465/amj.2017.0653] [DOI:10.5465/amj.2017.0653]
2. Tahir K, Khan N. Mediating role of body image between sexual functioning and marital intimacy in Pakistani women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2021; 30(2):260-6. [DOI:10.1002/pon.5563] [PMID] [DOI:10.1002/pon.5563]
3. Miller K, Kelly A. Is self-compassion contagious? An examination of whether hearing a display of self-compassion impacts self-compassion in the listener. Can J Behav Sci. 2020; 52(2):159-70. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/cbs0000150]
4. Du W, Luo M, Zhou Z. A study on the relationship between marital socioeconomic status, marital satisfaction, and depression: Analysis based on Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM). Appl Res Qual Life. 2021; 17:1477-99. [DOI:10.1007/s11482-021-09975-x] [DOI:10.1007/s11482-021-09975-x]
5. Fahimdanesh F, Noferesti A, Tavakol K. Self-compassion and forgiveness: major predictors of marital satisfaction in young couples. Am J Fam Ther. 2020; 48(3):221-34. [DOI:10.1080/01926187.2019.1708832] [DOI:10.1080/01926187.2019.1708832]
6. Frye N, Ganong L, Jensen T, Coleman M. A dyadic analysis of emotion regulation as a moderator of associations between marital conflict and marital satisfaction among first-married and remarried couples. J Fam Issues. 2020; 41(12):2328-55.[DOI:10.1177/0192513X20935504] [DOI:10.1177/0192513X20935504]
7. Abe S, Oshio A. Does marital duration moderate (dis) similarity effects of personality on marital satisfaction? Sage Open. 2018; 8(2). [DOI:10.1177/2158244018784985] [DOI:10.1177/2158244018784985]
8. Ifeoma Odinka J, Nwoke M, Chukwuorji JC, Egbuagu K, Mefoh P, Ndukuba AC, et al. Dependent personality, mindful awareness, and marital satisfaction and their association with postpartum psychological distress in two tertiary hospitals, Southeast Nigeria. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2020; 31(2):920-38. [DOI:10.1353/hpu.2020.0069] [PMID] [DOI:10.1353/hpu.2020.0069]
9. Riahi F, Golzari M, Mootabi F. [The relationship between emotion regulation and marital satisfaction using the actor-partner interdependence model (Persian)]. Iran J Psychiatry Clin Psychol. 2020; 26(1):44-63. [DOI:10.32598/ijpcp.26.1.3038.1] [DOI:10.32598/ijpcp.26.1.3038.1]
10. Vazquez V, Otero I, Goodlow J. Relationship stigma and Black-White interracial marital satisfaction: The mediating role of religious/spiritual well-being. Ment Health Relig Cult. 2019; 22(3):305-18. [DOI:10.1080/13674676.2019.1620189] [DOI:10.1080/13674676.2019.1620189]
11. Domaradzka E, Fajkowska M. Cognitive emotion regulation strategies in anxiety and depression understood as types of personality. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:856. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00856] [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00856]
12. Martin RC, Dahlen ER. Cognitive emotion regulation in the prediction of depression, anxiety, stress, and anger. Pers Individ Dif. 2005; 39(7):1249-1260. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.004] [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.004]
13. Peixoto-Freitas J, Rodríguez-González M, Crabtree SA, Martins MV. Differentiation of self, couple adjustment and family life cycle: A cross-sectional study. Am J Fam Ther. 2020; 48(4):299-316. [DOI:10.1080/01926187.2020.1736689] [DOI:10.1080/01926187.2020.1736689]
14. Bartle-Haring S, Ferriby M, Day R. Couple differentiation: Mediator or moderator of depressive symptoms and relationship satisfaction? J Marital Fam Ther. 2019; 45(4):563-77. [DOI:10.1111/jmft.12326] [PMID] [DOI:10.1111/jmft.12326]
15. Bui MV, McInnes E, Ennis G, Foster K. Protocol for a mixed methods process evaluation of the Promoting Resilience in Nurses (PRiN) trial. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022; 31(3):687-96. [DOI:10.1111/inm.12989] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1111/inm.12989]
16. Işık E, Özbiler Ş, Schweer-Collins ML, Rodríguez-González M. Differentiation of self predicts life satisfaction through marital adjustment. Am J Fam Ther. 2020; 48(3):235-49. [DOI:10.1080/01926187.2020.1732248] [DOI:10.1080/01926187.2020.1732248]
17. Lampis J, Cataudella S. Adult attachment and differentiation of self-constructs: A possible dialogue? Contemp Fam Ther. 2019; 41:227-35. [DOI:10.1007/s10591-019-09489-7] [DOI:10.1007/s10591-019-09489-7]
18. Çömez İkican T, Coşansu G, Erdoğan G, Küçük L, Özel Bilim İ. The relationship of marital adjustment and sexual satisfaction with depressive symptoms in women. Sex Disabil. 2020; 38:247-60. [DOI:10.1007/s11195-019-09590-7] [DOI:10.1007/s11195-019-09590-7]
19. Masten AS, Lucke CM, Nelson KM, Stallworthy IC. Resilience in development and psychopathology: Multisystem perspectives. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2021; 17:521-49. [DOI:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-120307] [PMID] [DOI:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-120307]
20. Noori J, Nejat H, Nameni E, Fariborzi E. Comparison of the effectiveness of the treatment of a monotheistic integrated and the objective relationship on self-differentiation and marital intimacy. Am J Fam Ther. 2020; 48(1):70-86. [DOI:10.1080/01926187.2019.1679052] [DOI:10.1080/01926187.2019.1679052]
21. Peleg O, Messerschmidt-Grandi C. Differentiation of self and trait anxiety: A cross-cultural perspective. Int J Psychol. 2019; 54(6):816-27. [DOI:10.1002/ijop.12535] [PMID] [DOI:10.1002/ijop.12535]
22. Robins NA. Of love and loathing: Marital life, strife, and intimacy in the Colonial Andes, 1750-1825. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; 2015. [DOI:10.2307/j.ctt1d9nhx8] [DOI:10.2307/j.ctt1d9nhx8]
23. Planalp EM, Van Hulle CA, Goldsmith HH. Parenting in context: Marital adjustment, parent affect, and child temperament in complex families. J Fam Psychol. 2019; 33(5):532-41. [DOI:10.1037/fam0000511] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1037/fam0000511]
24. Rikhye RV, Gilra A, Halassa MM. Thalamic regulation of switching between cortical representations enables cognitive flexibility. Nat Neurosci. 2018; 21(12):1753-63. [DOI:10.1038/s41593-018-0269-z] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1038/s41593-018-0269-z]
25. Toraman Ç, Özdemir HF, Aytuğ Koşan AM, Orakçı Ş. Relationships between cognitive flexibility, perceived quality of faculty life, learning approaches, and academic achievement. Int J Instr. 2020; 13(1):85-100. [DOI:10.29333/iji.2020.1316a] [DOI:10.29333/iji.2020.1316a]
26. Ünal Ö, Akgün S. Conflict resolution styles as predictors of marital adjustment and marital satisfaction: An actor-partner interdependence model. J Fam Stud. 2022; 28(3):898-913. [DOI:10.1080/13229400.2020.1766542] [DOI:10.1080/13229400.2020.1766542]
27. Whisman MA, du Pont A, Rhee SH, Spotts EL, Lichtenstein P, Ganiban JM, et al. A genetically informative analysis of the association between dyadic adjustment, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms. J Affect Disord. 2018; 237:18-26. [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.105] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.105]
28. Wilson AC, Mackintosh K, Power K, Chan SWY. Effectiveness of self-compassion related therapies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mindfulness. 2019; 10:979-95. [DOI:10.1007/s12671-018-1037-6] [DOI:10.1007/s12671-018-1037-6]
29. Yu Y, Yu Y, Lin Y. Anxiety and depression aggravate impulsiveness: the mediating and moderating role of cognitive flexibility. Psychol Health Med. 2020; 25(1):25-36. [DOI:10.1080/13548506.2019.1601748] [PMID] [DOI:10.1080/13548506.2019.1601748]
30. Zmigrod L, Rentfrow PJ, Zmigrod S, Robbins TW. Cognitive flexibility and religious disbelief. Psychol Res. 2019; 83(8):1749-59. [DOI:10.1007/s00426-018-1034-3] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1007/s00426-018-1034-3]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Owned by Qom University of Medical Sciences
Published by Qom University of Medical Sciences Press
eISSN: 2008-1375
pISSN: 1735-7799
Email: journal[at]muq.ac.ir
j.mua.ac[at]gmail.com
