Volume 13, Issue 12 (February 2020)
Qom Univ Med Sci J 2020, 13(12): 75-86 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rahbar S, Rahbar A, Mohebi S, Gharlipour Z, Ghorbani E, Nikseresht S et al . Designing and Validating of the Questionnaire of Factors Affecting Teacher - Student Relationship from the Point of View of Students of Qom University of Medical Sciences. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2020; 13 (12) :75-86
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-2679-en.html
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-2679-en.html
Shahrokh Rahbar1 
, Ahmad Rahbar * 2, Siamak Mohebi3 , Zabihollah Gharlipour3 , Elnaz Ghorbani4 , Sajad Nikseresht4 , Zohre Karami4
, Ahmad Rahbar * 2, Siamak Mohebi3 , Zabihollah Gharlipour3 , Elnaz Ghorbani4 , Sajad Nikseresht4 , Zohre Karami4
1- School of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences
2- Department of Public Health, School of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences ,ahm418rahbar@yahoo.com
3- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences
4- School of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences
2- Department of Public Health, School of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences ,
3- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences
4- School of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences
Abstract: (4248 Views)
Background and Objectives: Effective relationship between teacher and student is one of the most important indicators of effective teaching and a strong stimulus for learning. The present research was conducted with the objective of designing validating the questionnaire of factors affecting teacher - student relationship from the viewpoint of students of Qom University of Medical Sciences in 2015.
Methods: In this exploratory study, the questionnaire of the relationship between teachers and students, was designed with the initial list of 46 questions and the participation of 20 students and 5 faculty members. Questionnaire Validation was performed using face validity and content validity and determination of the construct validity, was carried out using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach alpha coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient tests were used to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. Data were analyzed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and using SPSS version 16 and Lisrel 8.80 soft wares.
Results: The results showed that 35 questions of the Teacher-Student Relationship questionnaire had an acceptable content validity (0.68 to 0.97). Measures of the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient, were reported to be 0.90 and 0.85, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis reduced the questions to 22 questions and categorized the items to five factors (individual ability, academic ability, communication, professional ethics, religion, and belief, and overall, explained a total of 54% of all variance of these variables.
Conclusion: The findings of this research indicated that the factors affecting the relationship between teachers and students, have acceptable validity and reliability and can be used in research activities.
Methods: In this exploratory study, the questionnaire of the relationship between teachers and students, was designed with the initial list of 46 questions and the participation of 20 students and 5 faculty members. Questionnaire Validation was performed using face validity and content validity and determination of the construct validity, was carried out using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach alpha coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient tests were used to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. Data were analyzed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and using SPSS version 16 and Lisrel 8.80 soft wares.
Results: The results showed that 35 questions of the Teacher-Student Relationship questionnaire had an acceptable content validity (0.68 to 0.97). Measures of the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient, were reported to be 0.90 and 0.85, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis reduced the questions to 22 questions and categorized the items to five factors (individual ability, academic ability, communication, professional ethics, religion, and belief, and overall, explained a total of 54% of all variance of these variables.
Conclusion: The findings of this research indicated that the factors affecting the relationship between teachers and students, have acceptable validity and reliability and can be used in research activities.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
آموزش پزشکی
Received: 2019/12/11 | Accepted: 2020/02/16 | Published: 2020/03/18
Received: 2019/12/11 | Accepted: 2020/02/16 | Published: 2020/03/18
References
1. Rezaei AM, Delavar A, Ahadi H, Dortaj F. Construction and validation of Iran students' evaluation of educational quality. Train Meas 2010;1(1):1-25. (In Persian) Link
2. Siamian H, Bala Ghafari A, Aligolbandi K, Nezhad SF, Fereshteh S, Sharifi Nick M, et al. Characteristics of a good university lecturer according to students. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2013;22(96):106-13. (In Persian) Link
3. Yunus MM, Osman WS, Ishak NM. Teacher-student relationship factor affecting motivation and academic achievement in ESL classroom. Proc Soc Behav Sci 2011;15:2637-41. Link [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.161]
4. Torabi A, Zahiri M. Study on influencing factors relationship between teacher and student in view of students of Ahvaz university of medical sciences. Jundishapur Sci Med J 2012;11(5):549-57. (In Persian) Link
5. Bahador H, Faraji Armaki A, Ghorbani R, Dehghani E. Effective factors on communication between teacher and student medical students of basic sciences level view. Educ Strateg Med Sci 2014;6(4):195-200. (In Persian) Link
6. Obeidi N. Effective factors on the communication between students and faculty members in the viewpoint of paramedical students. Educ Strateg Med Sci 2010;3(3):133-6. (In Persian) Link
7. Vakili MM, Nourian AA, Nasab M, Noradin S. Characteristics of a good teacher from the point of view of student and teaching staff in Zanjan university of medical sciences-2004. J Med Educ Dev 2009;1(1):17-28. (In Persian) Link
8. Amini M, Najafipour S, Torkan N, Ebrahimi Nejad F. Correlation between educational performance and communication skills of Jahrom medical teachers. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2010;12(5):100-5. (In Persian) Link
9. Ghadami A, Salehi B, Sajadi S, Naji H. Students' points of view regarding effective factors in establishing communication between students and faculty members. Iran J Med Educ 2007;7(1):149-54. (In Persian) Link
10. Akbari M, Moeintaghavi A, Ghanbari H, Bageri M, Otoufi A. Comparison of the students' and teachers' viewpoints about the characteristics of a good teacher in dentistry. J Mashhad Dent Sch 2015;38(4):281-90. (In Persian) Link
11. Watson PB, Seaton P, Sims D, Jamieson I, Mountier J, Whittle R, et al. Exploratory factor analysis of the clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teacher scale (CLES+ T). J Nurs Meas 2014;22(1):164-80. PMID: 24851671 [DOI:10.1891/1061-3749.22.1.164]
12. Covell K, McNeil JK, Howe RB. Reducing teacher burnout by increasing student engagement a children's rights approach. Sch Psychol Int 2009;30(3):282-90. Link [DOI:10.1177/0143034309106496]
13. Hughes JN, Luo W, Kwok OM, Loyd LK. Teacher-student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: a 3-year longitudinal study. J Educ Psychol 2008;100(1):1-14. PMID: 19578558 [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.1]
14. Abedini MR, Abassi A, Mortazavi FF, Bijari B. Students' viewpoint of factors affecting teacher-students communication, a study in Birjand University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ 2012;12(6):439-47. (In Persian) Link
15. Wubbels T, Brekelmans M. Two decades of research on teacher-student relationships in class. Int J Educ Res 2005;43(1):6-24. Link [DOI:10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.003]
16. Mohamedpour M, Motmaen Z, Fasanghari M. Effective mobile services acceptance factors. J Inform Technol Manag 2010;2(5):111-28. (In Persian) Link
17. Alami A, Moshki M, Alimardani A. Development and validation of theory of planned behavior questionnaire for exclusive breastfeeding. J Neyshabur Univ Med Sci 2014;2(4):45-53. (In Persian) Link
18. Mohammadbeigi A, Mohammadsalehi N, Aligol M. Validity and reliability of the instruments and types of measurements in health applied researches. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci 2015;13(12):1153-70. (In Persian) Link
19. Mi-young LW, Neuharth-Pritchett S. Examining factorial validity and measurement invariance of the student-teacher relationship scale. Early Childhood Res Quart 2011;26(2):205-15. Link [DOI:10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.09.004]
20. Taheri A. Identifying MA and PhD students' point of view regarding effective factors in establishing communication between students and faculty members of school of allied health at Tehran university of medical sciences in 2012-2013 academic year. J Med Educ Dev 2016;9(22):95-102. (In Persian) Link
21. Nizielski S, Hallum S, Lopes PN, Schütz A. Attention to student needs mediates the relationship between teacher emotional intelligence and student misconduct in the classroom. J Psychoed Assess 2012;30(4):320-9. Link [DOI:10.1177/0734282912449439]
22. Hokmabadi R, Fallah H. Ideal university teachers according to students' views. J Med Educ Dev 2013;6(10):22-9. (In Persian) Link
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Owned by Qom University of Medical Sciences
Published by Qom University of Medical Sciences Press
eISSN: 2008-1375
pISSN: 1735-7799
Email: journal[at]muq.ac.ir
j.mua.ac[at]gmail.com
