Volume 14, Issue 8 (October 2020)
Qom Univ Med Sci J 2020, 14(8): 71-84 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Bagheri Z, Dehdari T, Lotfizadeh M. Psychometrics of Emergency Risk Communication Checklist in Public Health Sector. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2020; 14 (8) :71-84
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-2885-en.html
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-2885-en.html
1- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Iran University of Medical Science
2- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Iran University of Medical Science , dehdarit@yahoo.com
3- Department of Public Health, School of Health, Sharekord University of Medical Sciences
2- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Iran University of Medical Science , dehdarit@yahoo.com
3- Department of Public Health, School of Health, Sharekord University of Medical Sciences
Abstract: (1878 Views)
Background and Objectives: Given the importance of effective communication in emergency and crisis situations, the use of a valid and reliable tool is vitally important to assess the health sector's preparedness in terms of risk communication. This study, conducted in Persian, aimed to investigate the psychometrics of emergency risk communication checklist in the public health sector.
Methods: In this psychometrics research, initially, the checklist designed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was translated into Persian using back translation method. Subsequently, the opinions of experts in various fields of health education in disasters and accidents were applied to evaluate the quality and quantity of content validity of the checklist items. In this regard, the content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR) of each item were assessed. Accordingly, the items with the CVI of ˂ 0.62 and CVR of ˂ 0.79 were deleted from the checklist. The face validity of the items was also evaluated. The reliability of the items was estimated in 30 health centers affiliated to Sharekord University of Medical Sciences, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province, Iran, using the Cohen’s kappa coefficient by two independent evaluators.
Results: Based on the results of the quantitative and qualitative content validity, eight items were edited, one item was removed, and six items were merged. Cohen’s kappa coefficient between the evaluators was obtained as 0.87 (P<0.0001) which is acceptable. Eventually, a 191-item checklist was obtained and confirmed.
Conclusion: The psychometrically valid checklist used in this study can assess the preparedness of the healthcare sector for risk communication in emergencies.
Methods: In this psychometrics research, initially, the checklist designed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was translated into Persian using back translation method. Subsequently, the opinions of experts in various fields of health education in disasters and accidents were applied to evaluate the quality and quantity of content validity of the checklist items. In this regard, the content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR) of each item were assessed. Accordingly, the items with the CVI of ˂ 0.62 and CVR of ˂ 0.79 were deleted from the checklist. The face validity of the items was also evaluated. The reliability of the items was estimated in 30 health centers affiliated to Sharekord University of Medical Sciences, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province, Iran, using the Cohen’s kappa coefficient by two independent evaluators.
Results: Based on the results of the quantitative and qualitative content validity, eight items were edited, one item was removed, and six items were merged. Cohen’s kappa coefficient between the evaluators was obtained as 0.87 (P<0.0001) which is acceptable. Eventually, a 191-item checklist was obtained and confirmed.
Conclusion: The psychometrically valid checklist used in this study can assess the preparedness of the healthcare sector for risk communication in emergencies.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
بهداشت عمومی
Received: 2020/07/28 | Accepted: 2020/10/3 | Published: 2020/11/30
Received: 2020/07/28 | Accepted: 2020/10/3 | Published: 2020/11/30
References
1. Azadian S, Shirali GA, Saki A. Reliability and validity of assessment of crisis management questionnaire based on seven principles of resilience engineering approach in hospitals. Iran Occup Health 2016;13(1):15-26. Link
2. World Health Organization. Disasters and emergencies. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2020. Link
3. Khan Y, O'Sullivan T, Brown A, Tracey S, Gibson J, Généreux M, et al. Public health emergency preparedness: a framework to promote resilience. BMC Public Health 2018;18(1):1344. PMID: 30518348 [DOI:10.1186/s12889-018-6250-7]
4. Veil S, Reynolds B, Sellnow TL, Seeger MW. CERC as a theoretical framework for research and practice. Health Promot Pract 2008;9(4 Suppl):26S-34S. PMID: 18936257 [DOI:10.1177/1524839908322113]
5. Salvi C, Frost M, Couillard C, Enderlein U, Nitzan D, World Health Organization. Emergency risk communication-early lessons learned during the pilot phase of a five-step capacity-building package. Public Health Panorama 2018;4(1):51-7. Link
6. Crisis & Emergency Risk Communication (CERC). Training. introduction to CERC. Atlanta, Georgia, America: Center of Disease Control and Prevention; 2018. Link
7. Shojaee P, Maleki M. Hospitals preparedness in Iran university of medical sciences in disasters in communications aspect. Quart Sci J Rescue Relief 2009;1(1):1-9. Link
8. Cargin DW, Parvanta C. Risk and emergency risk communication: a primer. In: Parvanta C, Nelson DE, Parvanta SA, Harner RN, editors. Essentials of public health communication. Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2011. P. 327-62. Link
9. World Health Organization. Emergency risk communication: international health Agreements (Module B1). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2020. Link
10. Courtney J, Cole G, Reynolds B. How the CDC is meeting the training demands of emergency risk communication. J Health Commun 2003;8(Suppl 1):128-9. PMID: 14692581 [DOI:10.1080/713851965]
11. Dickmann P, Biedenkopf N, Keeping S, Eickmann M, Becker S. Risk communication and crisis communication in infectious disease outbreaks in Germany: what is being done, and what needs to be done. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2014;8(3):206-11. PMID: 24804970 [DOI:10.1017/dmp.2014.36]
12. Qiu W, Chu C, Hou X, Rutherford S, Zhu B, Tong Z, et al. A comparison of China's risk communication in response to SARS and H7N9 using principles drawn from international practice. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2018;12(5):587-98. PMID: 28974284 [DOI:10.1017/dmp.2017.114]
13. Malik MR, Haq ZU, Saeed Q, Riley R, Khan WM. Distressed setting and profound challenges: pandemic influenza preparedness plans in the eastern Mediterranean region. J Infect Public Health 2018;11(3):352-6. PMID: 29029975 [DOI:10.1016/j.jiph.2017.09.018]
14. World Health Organization. Simulation exercises. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2020. Link
15. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol 1975;28(4):563-75. Link [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x]
16. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: principles and methods. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. Link
17. Bujang MA, Baharum N. Guidelines of the minimum sample size requirements for Kappa agreement test. Epidemiol Biostatistics Public Health 2017;14(2):e12267. Link
18. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med 2012;22(3):276-82. PMID: 23092060 [DOI:10.11613/BM.2012.031]
19. Vaziri N, Ardalan A, Ahmadnezhad E, Rahimi Foroshan A. Designing and determining the validity and reliability of questionnaire of disaster management performance. J Hosp 2015;14(1):63-70. Link
20. Iman E, Hosseini Teshnizi S, Tafrihi M, Alavi A, Jafari A, Badri S, et al. Nurses' knowledge about crisis management and its related factors. J Health Care 2011;13(4):10-8. Link
21. Hosseini Shokouh S, Arab M, Rahimi A, Rashidian A, Sadr Momtaz N. Preparedness of the Iran University of Medical Sciences hospitals against earthquake. J Sch Public Health Instit Public Health Res 2009;6(3):61-77. Link
22. Jahangiri K, Sohrabizadeh S, Sadighi J, Tavousi M, Rostami R. Assessing hospital preparedness for nuclear and radiological events: development a valid and reliable instrument. Payesh 2016;15(6):619-27. Link
23. Mottaghian NA, Dadgari F, Farsi Z. The effect of education of hospital of incident command system on preparedness of nurses in nuclear accidents in military hospitals of Mashhad. Mil Caring Sci 2018;4(3):147-58. Link [DOI:10.29252/mcs.4.3.147]
24. Safarpour H, Safi-Keykaleh M, Eskandari Z, Yousefian S, Faghisolouk F, Sohrabizadeh S. Hospital's preparedness in road traffic injuries with mass casualties: exploring a valid and reliable checklist. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2019;1(1):1-8. Link [DOI:10.1177/1024907919870662]
25. Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front Public Health 2018;6:149. PMID: 29942800 [DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149]
26. Hickey J, Gagnon AJ, Jitthai N. Pandemic preparedness: perceptions of vulnerable migrants in Thailand towards WHO-recommended non-pharmaceutical interventions: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2014;14(1):665. PMID: 24973943 [DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-665]
27. Hojat M, Sirati Nir M, Khaghanizade M, Karimi Zarchi M. Investigation of preparedness rate of Tehran's hospitals encounters unexpected events. Daneshvar J 2008;15(74):1-10. Link
28. Khankeh H, Amanat N, Hosseini MA, Mohammadi F, Sadeghi A, Aghighi A. The effect of earthquake preparedness training to male high school students on families' preparedness in Eshtehard city 2010-2011. Sci J Rescue Relief 2013;5(3):27-39. Link
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
