[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: ::
:: Volume 14, Issue 12 (February 2021) ::
Qom Univ Med Sci J 2021, 14(12): 22-31 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of Time Indicators and Outcome of Pre-hospital Emergency Operations in Two Methods of Electronic Registration with Asayar Program and Paper Registration
Mina Gaeeni1 , Mehdi Ranjbar Vernosfadarani * 2, Mohammad Parvaresh Massoud3 , Amir Hemta4
1- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
2- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran. , ranjbar2273@yahoo.com
3- Department of Medical Emergencies, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Qom University of Medical Sciences Qom, Iran.
4- Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Abstract:   (1687 Views)
Background and Objectives: Pre-hospital care report is a valid medical document containing demographic information, vital signs, times related to ambulance location, evaluations, and performed medical procedures. With the advancement of technology and communication, Asayar smart program has replaced the paper registration method. Therefore, the current study aimed to compare the time indicators and outcome of pre-hospital emergency operations in two methods of electronic registration with the Asayar program and paper registration.
 
Methods: This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in Isfahan in 2019. A number of 700 missions registered by paper in 2017 and 230 missions recorded by Asayar program methods in 2018 were reviewed. Samples were selected by a stratified method with a proportional allocation approach. In order to collect data, researcher-made tools were designed, and content validity was examined. Data analysis was performed by propensity score matching, descriptive statistics, as well as Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests.
 
Results: The results demonstrated that incomplete data were obtained at 2.68% and 7.19%  in the Asayar method and the paper method, respectively. The rates of hospital admission in the Asayar and paper methods were reported as 0.9% and  4.9%, respectively. Ambulance arrival time at the patient's bedside, in the Asayar and paper methods were calculated at 8 min and 43 sec and 11 min and 30 sec, respectively. Moreover, the time of ambulance discharge from the hospital in the Asayar and paper methods were reported as 9 min and 20 sec and 12 min and 37 sec.
 
Conclusion: As evidenced by the obtained results, documentation by the Asayar method reduced the lost data and increased patient admission in hospitals. Furthermore, it reduced the time of ambulance arrival at the patient's bedside and the time of ambulance release.
Keywords: Mobile Applications, Electronic Health Records, Emergency Medical Services
Full-Text [PDF 651 kb]   (583 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: پرستاری-جراحی-ویژه-کودکان
Received: 2021/02/1 | Accepted: 2021/03/31 | Published: 2021/02/28
References
1. 1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Emergency care and transportation of the sick and injured. Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2014. Link
2. Shakeri K, Jafari M, Khankeh H, Seyedin H. History and structure of the fourth leading emergency medical service in the world; a review article. Arch Acad Emerg Med 2019;7 (1):e17. Link
3. Abdellah OA, Aborokbah MM, Elfaki AO. Improving pre-hospital care of road traffic accident's victims with smartphone technology. Int J Interact Mobile Technol 2018;12 (2):130-41. DOI: 10.3991/ijim.v12i2.8118 [DOI:10.3991/ijim.v12i2.8118]
4. Martinez R, Rogers A, Numanoglu A, Rode H. The value of WhatsApp communication in paediatric burn care. Burns 2018;44 (4):947-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.11.005 [DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2017.11.005]
5. Yadollahi S. The quality of documentation in pre-hospital emergency mission forms; a cross-sectional study. Iran J Emerg Med 2018;5 (1):e20. Link
6. Pervez F, Qadir J, Khalil M, Yaqoob T, Ashraf U, Younis S. Wireless technologies for emergency response: a comprehensive review and some guidelines. IEEE Access 2018;6:71814-38. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2878898 [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2878898]
7. Porter A, Badshah A, Black S, Fitzpatrick D, Harris-Mayes R, Islam S, et al. Electronic health records in ambulances: the ERA multiple-methods study. Health Serv Deliv Res 2020;8 (10):1-179. DOI: 10.3310/hsdr08100 [DOI:10.3310/hsdr08100]
8. Johansson A, Esbjörnsson M, Nordqvist P, Wiinberg S, Andersson R, Ivarsson B, et al. Technical feasibility and ambulance nurses' view of a digital telemedicine system in pre-hospital stroke care-a pilot study. Int Emerg Nurs 2019;44:35-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2019.03.008 [DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2019.03.008]
9. Jahanshir A, Karimialavijeh E, Sheikh H, Vahedi M, Momeni M. Smartphones and medical applications in the emergency department daily practice. Emergency 2017;5 (1):e14. Link
10. Dadashzadeh A, Dehghannejhad J, Shams Vahdati S, Soheili A, Sadeghi Bazarghani H. The nature of prehospital medical interventions delivered to traumatic patients in Tabriz. Nurs Midwifery J 2017;15 (3):159-67. Link
11. Nehme Z, Andrew E, Smith K. Factors influencing the timeliness of emergency medical service response to time critical emergencies. Prehospital Emerg Care 2016;20 (6):783-91. DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2016.1164776 [DOI:10.3109/10903127.2016.1164776]
12. Amoah J, Stuart EA, Cosgrove SE, Harris AD, Han JH, Lautenbach E, et al. Comparing propensity score methods versus traditional regression analysis for the evaluation of observational data: a case study evaluating the treatment of gram-negative bloodstream infections. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71 (9):e497-505. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa169 [DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa169]
13. Yoo CW, Goo J, Huang D, Behara R. Explaining task support satisfaction on electronic patient care report (ePCR) in emergency medical services (EMS): an elaboration likelihood model lens. Boca Raton, Florida: Florida Atlantic University; 2017. Link
14. Pearce D, Hocking G, Sahathevan R, Oqueli E, Bagot KL. Reducing variation in care and improving patient flow by streamlining communication: Interim results from the Pulsara smartphone communication app. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University; 2018. Link
15. Afzali F. The impact of emergency medical services (EMS) automation system on users workflow and patient care process: school of health information and management. [Master Thesis]. Kerman: Kerman University of Medical; 2018. Link
16. Delshad V, Shemshad H, Moradian M, Ahmadi S, Malkyan L, Sabzalizadeh S. The effect of applying global positioning system in ambulances on response time of Tehran emergency medical service. Health Emerg Disast 2016;1 (3):125-8. DOI: 10.15412/J.HDQ.09010302 [DOI:10.15412/J.HDQ.09010302]
17. Wu X, Dunne R, Yu Z, Shi W. STREMS: a smart real-time solution toward enhancing EMS prehospital quality. 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies (CHASE), Philadelphia, PA, USA; 2017. DOI: 10.1109/CHASE.2017.120 [DOI:10.1109/CHASE.2017.120]
18. Weinlich M, Kurz P, Blau MB, Walcher F, Piatek S. Significant acceleration of emergency response using smartphone geolocation data and a worldwide emergency call support system. PloS One 2018;13 (5):e0196336. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196336 [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0196336]
19. Mogharab M, Sharifzadeh G, Hosseini MR, Bazeli J, Esmaeilzadeh MH. The effect of pre-hospital trauma management training program on time indices of emergency medical services. Sci J Kurdistan Univ Med Sci 2019;24 (3):43-54. DOI: 10.29252/sjku.24.3.43 [DOI:10.29252/sjku.24.3.43]
20. Doggett S, Ragland DR, Felschundneff G. Prehospital response time and traumatic injury-a review. California: California Digital Library; 2018. Link
21. Parker CA, Liu N, Wu SX, Shen Y, Lam SS, Ong ME. Predicting hospital admission at the emergency department triage: a novel prediction model. Am J Emerg Med 2019;37 (8):1498-504. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.060. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.060]
22. Zeretzke-Bien CM, Avva U, Jara F. Emergency medical services. Prepare for the pediatric emergency medicine board examination. Cham: Springer; 2020. Link [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-28372-8_3]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Gaeeni M, Ranjbar Vernosfadarani M, Parvaresh Massoud M, Hemta A. Comparison of Time Indicators and Outcome of Pre-hospital Emergency Operations in Two Methods of Electronic Registration with Asayar Program and Paper Registration. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2021; 14 (12) :22-31
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-3052-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 14, Issue 12 (February 2021) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی قم Qom University of Medical Sciences Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4538