Volume 15, Issue 10 (January 2022)
Qom Univ Med Sci J 2022, 15(10): 696-707 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hoseini M, Ahmadi E, Shahamat N, Amirianzadeh M. Investigating the Components of Research Performance of Faculty Members of Yasuj University of Medical Sciences: A Qualitative Study. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2022; 15 (10) :696-707
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-3262-en.html
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-3262-en.html
1- Department of Educational Management, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran.
2- Department of Educational Management, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran. ,Ebadahmadi@yahoo.com
2- Department of Educational Management, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran. ,
Abstract: (1304 Views)
Background and Objectives: Giving importance to research and increasing research activities in each country provides appropriate contexts for the development and progress of that country. This study was conducted to identify components related to the performance of faculty members of Yasuj University of Medical Sciences.
Methods: This research is a qualitative study of descriptive-exploratory type. In this study, purposeful sampling was used. Data collection was performed through semi-structured in-depth interviews, face to face and telephone calls. The key participants in the study were faculty members of Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, of whom 21 were selected by purposeful sampling and interviewed. Each interview lasted an average of 40 to 60 minutes. Atrid-Sterling method was also used for analysis.
Results: In this study, 21 faculty members of Yasuj University of Medical Sciences participated in the study, which 9 were female and 11 were male. In terms of academic rank, 4 people had full professor, 7 people had associate professor and 10 people had assistant professor. Finally, after analyzing the interview data and first coding, 80 basic themes were obtained, which were then reduced to fourteen organizing themes. Finally, global themes policy, individual and situational were identified as factors related to faculty research performance.
Conclusion: to achieve a comprehensive performance in the field of research depends on proper and correct planning in this area. Situations such as team thinking, knowledge-based, and community-oriented can improve faculty members’ research performance.
Methods: This research is a qualitative study of descriptive-exploratory type. In this study, purposeful sampling was used. Data collection was performed through semi-structured in-depth interviews, face to face and telephone calls. The key participants in the study were faculty members of Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, of whom 21 were selected by purposeful sampling and interviewed. Each interview lasted an average of 40 to 60 minutes. Atrid-Sterling method was also used for analysis.
Results: In this study, 21 faculty members of Yasuj University of Medical Sciences participated in the study, which 9 were female and 11 were male. In terms of academic rank, 4 people had full professor, 7 people had associate professor and 10 people had assistant professor. Finally, after analyzing the interview data and first coding, 80 basic themes were obtained, which were then reduced to fourteen organizing themes. Finally, global themes policy, individual and situational were identified as factors related to faculty research performance.
Conclusion: to achieve a comprehensive performance in the field of research depends on proper and correct planning in this area. Situations such as team thinking, knowledge-based, and community-oriented can improve faculty members’ research performance.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
مدیریت بهداشتی
Received: 2021/09/20 | Accepted: 2021/12/14 | Published: 2021/12/1
Received: 2021/09/20 | Accepted: 2021/12/14 | Published: 2021/12/1
References
1. Foroughi F, Kharrazi H. [Faculty members' scientific productivity in Kermanshah Medical Sciences University (Persian)]. Iran J Med Educ. 2005; 5(2):181-7. https://vc-research.kums.ac.ir/fa/news/36153/%D9
2. Khoshfar GR. [The role of research, research centers, research and economic-social development (Persian)]. J Rahyaft 2001; 22:98-103. https://www.sid.ir/fa/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=37678
3. Zhang E, Shi W. Analysis on the evaluation system of humanities teachers' scientific research performance in American Public Colleges and Universities. In: 3rd International Conference on Culture, Education and Economic Development of Modern Society (ICCESE 2019) 2019 Apr (pp. 1490-1493). Atlantis Press. [DOI:10.2991/iccese-19.2019.329] [DOI:10.2991/iccese-19.2019.329]
4. Veisani Y, Delpisheh A. Barriers to research implementation in medical sciences in iran from the viewpoints of faculty members, researchers, and students: A systematic review. J Ilam Univ Med Sci (SJIMU). 2019; 27(1):13-24. [DOI:10.29252/sjimu.27.1.13] [DOI:10.29252/sjimu.27.1.13]
5. Brennan J, Shah T. Quality assessment and institutional change: Experiences from 14 countries. Higher Educ. 2000; 40(3):331-49. [DOI:10.1023/A:1004159425182] [DOI:10.1023/A:1004159425182]
6. Hosseingholizadeh R. The basic requirements of interaction of university-industry: A knowledge management approach. Iran J Eng Education, 2012; 14(54):1-19. http://ijee.ias.ac.ir/article_2612.html
7. Rajaipour S, Rahimi H. A Study of the Relationship Between the Changing Process of Knowledge Management and the Performance of University of Isfahan Faculty Members. J Faculty Humanit Soc Sci. 2008; 8(31):59-76. https://www.sid.ir/en/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=142337
8. Ebrahimzadeh F, Naserian J, Ghorbani M, Almasi A. The assessment of barriers to research from the viewpoint of faculty members of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences and relationship to research performance of them. J Sci Res. 2016; 18(1):28-41. https://www.sid.ir/en/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=506817
9. Sotodeh Asl N, Ghorbani R, Rashidy-Pour A. Viewpoints of faculty members of Semnan University of Medical Sciences about research barriers. Koomesh. 2014; 16(1):1-7. http://koomeshjournal.semums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_id=2422&sid=1&slc_lang=en
10. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006; 3(2):77-101. [DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa] [DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
11. Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res. 2001; 1(3):385-405. [DOI:10.1177/146879410100100307] [DOI:10.1177/146879410100100307]
12. Shevlin M, Miles JN. Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Pers Individ Differ. 1998; 25(1):85-90. [DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00055-5] [DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00055-5]
13. Wetzels M, Odekerken-Schröder G, Van Oppen C. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. Manag Inf Syst Q. 2009; 33(1):177-95. [DOI:10.2307/20650284] [DOI:10.2307/20650284]
14. Hadjinicola GC, Soteriou AC. Factors affecting research productivity of production and operations management groups: An empirical study. Adv Decision Sci. 2006; Article ID 096542:16. [DOI:10.1155/JAMDS/2006/96542] [DOI:10.1155/JAMDS/2006/96542]
15. Kotrlik JW, Bartlett JE, Higgins CC, Williams HA. Factors associated with research productivity of agricultural education faculty. J Agric Educ. 2002; 43(3):1-10. [DOI:10.5032/jae.2002.03001] [DOI:10.5032/jae.2002.03001]
16. Mehrmohammadi M. [Thoughts on research in education (Persian)]. Tehran: Institute for Educational Research; 1999.
17. Faely S, Pezeshki Rad G, Chizari M. The survey of effective factors on students' contribution in research activities and scientific production. J Res Plan Higher Educ (IRPHE). 2007; 12(4):93-107. https://www.sid.ir/en/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=62590
18. European Commission (EC). Commission of the European Communities. The Role of the University in the Europe of Knowledge. Brussels: EUC. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=LEGISSUM:c11067/.
19. Wood F. Factors influencing research performance of university academic staff. Higher Educ. 1990; 19(1):81-100. [DOI:10.1007/BF00142025] [DOI:10.1007/BF00142025]
20. Graham CW. Increased research performance through reduced stress and improved human well-being. Soc Res Admin. 1989; 21(1):35-40. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA7980559&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00380024&p=AONE&sw=w
21. Ryan JC. The work motivation of research scientists and its effect on research performance. R & D Mgmt. 2014; 44(4):355-69. [DOI:10.1111/radm.12063] [DOI:10.1111/radm.12063]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Owned by Qom University of Medical Sciences
Published by Qom University of Medical Sciences Press
eISSN: 2008-1375
pISSN: 1735-7799
Email: journal[at]muq.ac.ir
j.mua.ac[at]gmail.com
