Volume 18 -                   Qom Univ Med Sci J 2024, 18 - : 0-0 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zohrabi R, Shojaei S, Mohammadbeigi A, Torabian H. Comparing the Patient Privacy Protection in Emergency and Inpatient Departments of a Hospital in Qom, Iran and Its Relationship With Patient Trust in Nurses. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2024; 18 : 34.4
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-3770-en.html
1- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
2- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran. , sarallahshojaei@gmail.com
3- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Abstract:   (647 Views)
Background and Objectives: Respecting the patient’s privacy is the basic principle for building trust in the treatment staff, including nurses. Nurses’ awareness of the principles of patient privacy protection and training how to gain the patient trust have attracted the attention of researchers and hospital managers. This study aims to compare patient privacy protection in inpatient and emergency departments of a hospital in Qom, Iran and assess its relationship with patient trust in nurses.
Methods: This is a cross-sectional analytical study and was conducted in 2021-2022. Participants were 110 patients from the emergency department and 110 patients from the inpatient departments of Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Qom City. They were selected using a convenience sampling method. Data collection tools included a sociodemographic form, Tehrani et al.’s privacy scale in hospitalized patients and Radwin & Cabral’s trust in nurses scale (TNS). Data were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation test in SPSS software, version 21.
Results: In the inpatient departments, the TNS score was higher than in the emergency department (89.03±13.11 vs 84.51±13.92). In the inpatient departments, the highest score of privacy scale was in the psychosocial domain (83.56±17.09) and the lowest score was in the personal domain (77.15±22.89). The highest score of privacy scale in the emergency department was in the personal domain (74.14±22.4) and the lowest score was in the spiritual-religious dimension (63.86±20.73). There was a significant correlation between patient privacy and patient trust in nurses (P<0.05).
Conclusion: The increase in respecting for patient privacy can increase patient trust in nurses. Nursing managers can increase patients’ trust in nurses by providing patient privacy educational courses to nurses in the emergency and inpatient departments.
Article number: 34.4
Full-Text [PDF 4580 kb]   (196 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (45 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: پرستاری-جراحی-ویژه-کودکان
Received: 2023/07/8 | Accepted: 2024/02/12 | Published: 2024/04/29

References
1. Sun W, Cai Z, Li Y, Liu F, Fang S, Wang G. Security and privacy in the medical internet of things: A review. Secur Commun Netw. 2018; 2018(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1155/2018/5978636] [DOI:10.1155/2018/5978636]
2. Moskop JC, Marco CA, Larkin GL, Geiderman JM, Derse AR. From hippocrates to HIPAA: Privacy and confidentiality in emergency medicine--Part I: Conceptual, moral, and legal foundations. Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 45(1):53-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.08.008] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.08.008]
3. Ozturk H, Sayligil O, Musmul A, Acar NE. The perception of privacy in the emergency department: Medical faculty hospital as a case in point. Konuralp Med J. 2018; 10(1):26-33. [DOI:10.18521/ktd.356832] [DOI:10.18521/ktd.356832]
4. Aksoy S, Komurcu N. Privacy in perinatal services: A qualitative study. IOSR J Nurs Health Sci. 2018; 7(5):64-73. [Link]
5. Baillie L. Mixed-sex wards and patient dignity: Nurses and patients perspectives. Br J Nurs. 2008; 17(19):1220-5. [DOI:10.12968/bjon.2008.17.19.31461] [PMID] [DOI:10.12968/bjon.2008.17.19.31461]
6. Leino-Kilpi H, Välimäki M, Dassen T, Gasull M, Lemonidou C, Scott PA, et al. Perceptions of autonomy, privacy and informed consent in the care of elderly people in five European countries: Comparison and implications for the future. Nurs Ethics. 2003; 10(1):58-66. [DOI:10.1191/0969733003ne575oa] [PMID] [DOI:10.1191/0969733003ne575oa]
7. Moskop JC, Marco CA, Larkin GL, Geiderman JM, Derse AR. From Hippocrates to HIPAA: Privacy and confidentiality in emergency medicine-part I: Conceptual, moral, and legal foundations. Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 45(1):53-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.08.008] [DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.08.008]
8. Tehrani TH, Ebadi A, Maddah SB, Mohammadi Shahboulaghi F, Ghanei Gheshlagh R, Fallahi-Khoshknab M. Development and Validation of Iranian version of privacy inventory in hospitalized patients. Sci J Nurs Midwifery Paramed Fac. 2021; 6(3):36-47. [Link]
9. Glikson E, Woolley AW. Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Acad Manage Ann. 2020; 14(2):627-60. [DOI:10.5465/annals.2018.0057] [DOI:10.5465/annals.2018.0057]
10. Strauss B. The patient perception of the nurse-patient relationship when nurses utilize an electronic health record within a hospital setting. Comput Inform Nurs. 2013; 31(12):596-604. [DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000000014] [PMID] [DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000000014]
11. Hurst W, Boddy A, Merabti M, Shone N. Patient privacy violation detection in healthcare critical infrastructures: An investigation using density-based benchmarking. Future Internet. 2020; 12(6):100. [DOI:10.3390/fi12060100] [DOI:10.3390/fi12060100]
12. Hartigan L, Cussen L, Meaney S, O'Donoghue K. Patients' perception of privacy and confidentiality in the emergency department of a busy obstetric unit. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):978. [DOI:10.1186/s12913-018-3782-6] [PMID] [DOI:10.1186/s12913-018-3782-6]
13. Nooripour R, Habibi M, Ghnabari N, Hoseein Zade Oskoei A. An investigation into psychometric properties of trust in nurses scale. J Psychometry. 2016; 4(15):1-12. [Link]
14. Zirak M, Ghafourifard M, Aghajanloo A, Haririan H. [Respect for patient privacy in the teaching hospitals of Zanjan (Persian). Iran J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2015; 8(1):79-89. [Link]
15. Akyüz E, Erdemir F. Surgical patients' and nurses' opinions and expectations about privacy in care. Nurs Ethics. 2013; 20(6):660-71. [DOI:10.1177/0969733012468931] [PMID] [DOI:10.1177/0969733012468931]
16. Sharifi M, Mafi AA. [Comparative assessment of patients' rights observance in the hospitalization wards of Shahid Beheshti University of medical sciences' hospitals (Persian)]. Alborz Univ Med J. 2017; 6(2):130-7. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.aums.6.2.130] [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.aums.6.2.130]
17. Hajbagheri MA, Zehtabchi S. Evaluation of elderly patients' privacy and their satisfaction level of privacy in selected hospitals in Esfahan. J Med Ethics. 2014; 29(8):120-97. [Link]
18. Aghajani M, Dehghannayeri N. [The rate of observe "various dimensions of Patients Privacy" by treatment team (Persian)]. Iran J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2009; 2(1): 59-70. [Link]
19. Hatamabadi H, Alimohammadi H. [Reasons for long-stay admission in a typical overcrowded emergency of a teaching hospital in Tehran capital city (Persian)]. Pajoohande. 2008; 13(1):71-5. [Link]
20. Serenko N, Fan L. Patients' perceptions of privacy and their outcomes in healthcare. Int J Behav Healthc Res. 2013; 4(2):101-22. [DOI:10.1504/IJBHR.2013.057359] [DOI:10.1504/IJBHR.2013.057359]
21. Iott BE, Campos-Castillo C, Anthony DL. Trust and privacy: How patient trust in providers is related to privacy behaviors and attitudes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020; 2019:487-93. [PMID]
22. Shen N, Bernier T, Sequeira L, Strauss J, Silver MP, Carter-Langford A, et al. Understanding the patient privacy perspective on health information exchange: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2019; 125:1-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.014] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.014]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Qom University of Medical Sciences Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb