Ethics code: IR.MUQ.REC.1400.098
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Aligol M, vesli monfared E, Aminpour E E, Seifi F, Seyed farajollah A. The Relationship Between Resilience and Marital Adjustment in Married Women With Breast Cancer in Qom, Iran. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2024; 18 : 802.6
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-3939-en.html
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-3939-en.html
MOHAMMAD Aligol1 
, Ehsan Vesli monfared * 2, Elaheh Elaheh Aminpour3 , Farideh Seifi4 , Ameneh Seyed farajollah5
, Ehsan Vesli monfared * 2, Elaheh Elaheh Aminpour3 , Farideh Seifi4 , Ameneh Seyed farajollah5
1- Department of Health Promotion and Education, Environmental Pollutants Research Center, Faculty of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
2- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Diseases Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran. ,vesalimonfared@gmail.com
3- Student Research Committee, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
4- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Ardabil University of Medical Science, Ardabil, Iran.
5- Vice-Chancellor of Research and Technology, Qom University of Medical Science, Qom, Iran.
2- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Diseases Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran. ,
3- Student Research Committee, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
4- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Ardabil University of Medical Science, Ardabil, Iran.
5- Vice-Chancellor of Research and Technology, Qom University of Medical Science, Qom, Iran.
Abstract: (417 Views)
Background and Objectives: Breast cancer is one of the common cancers in women. This study aims to determine the relationship between resilience and marital adjustment in married women with breast cancer, Qom, Iran.
Methods: This is a descriptive-correlational study that was conducted in 2022 on 167 married women with breast cancer in Qom, Iran, who were selected using a sequential sampling method. The research tools were Spinner’s dyadic adjustment scale (DAS) and the Connor-Davidson resilience scale. Data analysis was performed in SPSS software, version 23 using descriptive and analytical tests (Pearson correlation test and linear regression). The significance level was set at of 0.05.
Results: The mean age of women was 51.2±8.8 years. There was a positive and significant correlation between resilience and marital adjustment (r=0.662, P<0.01) and between resilience and income level (r=0.24, P=0.002). Resilience had a positive and significant correlation with affection expression, cohesion, and consensus domains of marital adjustment (P<0.01). The results of regression analysis showed that resilience (β=0.61, 95% CI, 0.36%, 0.53%, P<0.01) and number of children (β=0.28, 95% CI, 1.34%, 3.27%, P<0.01) were the significant predictors of marital adjustment.
Conclusion: Resilience is the predictor of marital adjustment in Iranian married women with breast cancer. Attention should be paid to the resilience of these women to improve their marital adjustment.
Methods: This is a descriptive-correlational study that was conducted in 2022 on 167 married women with breast cancer in Qom, Iran, who were selected using a sequential sampling method. The research tools were Spinner’s dyadic adjustment scale (DAS) and the Connor-Davidson resilience scale. Data analysis was performed in SPSS software, version 23 using descriptive and analytical tests (Pearson correlation test and linear regression). The significance level was set at of 0.05.
Results: The mean age of women was 51.2±8.8 years. There was a positive and significant correlation between resilience and marital adjustment (r=0.662, P<0.01) and between resilience and income level (r=0.24, P=0.002). Resilience had a positive and significant correlation with affection expression, cohesion, and consensus domains of marital adjustment (P<0.01). The results of regression analysis showed that resilience (β=0.61, 95% CI, 0.36%, 0.53%, P<0.01) and number of children (β=0.28, 95% CI, 1.34%, 3.27%, P<0.01) were the significant predictors of marital adjustment.
Conclusion: Resilience is the predictor of marital adjustment in Iranian married women with breast cancer. Attention should be paid to the resilience of these women to improve their marital adjustment.
Article number: 802.6
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
بهداشت عمومی
Received: 2024/04/9 | Accepted: 2024/05/19 | Published: 2024/04/29
Received: 2024/04/9 | Accepted: 2024/05/19 | Published: 2024/04/29
References
1. Francies FZ, Hull R, Khanyile R, Dlamini Z. Breast cancer in low-middle income countries: Abnormality in splicing and lack of targeted treatment options. Am J Cancer Res. 2020; 10(5):1568-91. [PMID]
2. Sopik V. International variation in breast cancer incidence and mortality in young women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021; 186:497-507. [DOI:10.1007/s10549-020-06003-8] [DOI:10.1007/s10549-020-06003-8]
3. De Miglio MR, Mello-Thoms C. Reviews in breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1161583. [DOI:10.3389/fonc.2023.1161583] [DOI:10.3389/fonc.2023.1161583]
4. Dinapoli L, Collocal G, Di Capua B, Valentini V. Psychological aspects to consider in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. Curr Oncol Rep. 2021; 23:38. [DOI:10.1007/s11912-021-01049-3] [DOI:10.1007/s11912-021-01049-3]
5. Martino ML, Lemmo D, Gargiulo A. A review of the psychological impact of breast cancer in women below 50 years old. Health Care Women Int. 2021; 42(7-9):1066-85. [DOI:10.1080/07399332.2021.1901901] [DOI:10.1080/07399332.2021.1901901]
6. Boscher C, Joly F, Clarisse B, Humbert X, Grellard J-M, Binarelli G, et al. Perceived cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors and its relationships with psychological factors. Cancers. 2020; 12(10):3000. [DOI:10.3390/cancers12103000] [DOI:10.3390/cancers12103000]
7. Fortin J, Leblanc M, Elgbeili G, Cordova MJ, Marin M-F, Brunet A. The mental health impacts of receiving a breast cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2021; 125(11):1582-92. [DOI:10.1038/s41416-021-01542-3] [DOI:10.1038/s41416-021-01542-3]
8. Naemi AM. Relationship between basic psychological needs satisfaction with resilience and marital satisfaction in teachers. Int J Educ Psychol Res. 2018; 4(2):78. [Link]
9. Shahriar S, kazemianmoghadam K, Khalfi A, Mehrabizadeh Honarmand M. [The relationship between marital intimacy on life satisfaction with mediating love, marital compatibility, and marital satisfaction in the employees pepole (Persian)]. Psychol Achiev. 2023; 30(2):37-58. [DOI:10.22055/psy.2022.40425.2823]
10. Nadolu D, Duncan R, Bahnaru A. Sociological dimensions of marital satisfaction in Romania. Plos One. 2020; 15(8):e0237923. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0237923] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0237923]
11. Gharibi M, Sanagouymoharer G, Yaghoubinia F. The relationship between quality of life with marital satisfaction in nurses in social security hospital in Zahedan. Glob J Health Sci. 2015; 8(2):178-84. [DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v8n2p178] [DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v8n2p178]
12. Macía P, Barranco M, Gorbeña S, Iraurgi I. Expression of resilience, coping and quality of life in people with cancer. Plos One. 2020; 15(7):e0236572. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0236572] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0236572]
13. Macía P, Barranco M, Gorbeña S, Álvarez-Fuentes E, Iraurgi I. Resilience and coping strategies about mental health outcomes in people with cancer. Plos One. 2021; 16(5):e0252075. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0252075] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0252075]
14. Tamura S, Suzuki K, Ito Y, Fukawa A. Factors related to the resilience and mental health of adult cancer patients: A systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2021; 29:3471-86. [DOI:10.1007/s00520-020-05943-7] [DOI:10.1007/s00520-020-05943-7]
15. Baghaei F, Yousefi Afrashteh M. The relationship between original family health, sensation seeking, and resilience with marital commitment. Iran J Educ Res. 2022; 1(4):64-75. [DOI:10.52547/ijer.1.4.64] [DOI:10.52547/ijer.1.4.64]
16. Li MY, Yang YL, Liu L, Wang L. Effects of social support, hope and resilience on quality of life among Chinese bladder cancer patients: A cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016; 14:1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s12955-016-0481-z] [DOI:10.1186/s12955-016-0481-z]
17. Sanai B. Family and marriage measurement scales. Tehran: Besat; 2017. [Link]
18. Khoshouei MS. Psychometric evaluation of the Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) using Iranian students. Int J Test. 2009; 9(1):60-6. [DOI:10.1080/15305050902733471] [DOI:10.1080/15305050902733471]
19. Nabizadeh F, Mahdavi A. Relationship between hardiness and marital satisfaction in women with breast cancer. Arch Breast Cancer. 2016; 3(3):92-6. [DOI:10.19187/abc.20163392-96]
20. Sarafino EP, Smith TW. Health psychology: Biopsychosocial interactions. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2014. [Link]
21. Ungar M. Resilience across cultures. Br J Soc Work. 2008; 38(2):218-35. [DOI:10.1093/bjsw/bcl343] [DOI:10.1093/bjsw/bcl343]
22. Surijah EA, Prasad GH, Saraswati MRA. Couple resilience predicted marital satisfaction but not well-being and health for married couples in Bali, Indonesia. Psikohumaniora. 2021; 6(1):13-32. [DOI:10.21580/pjpp.v6i1.6520] [DOI:10.21580/pjpp.v6i1.6520]
23. Ebad Por A, Saber S. Assessment of marital satisfaction based on resilience and self-differentiation. Psychometry. 2015; 4(13):1-11. [Link]
24. Milioni M, Alessandri G, Eisenberg N, Castellani V, Zuffianò A, Vecchione M, et al. Reciprocal relations between emotional self‐efficacy beliefs and ego-resiliency across time. J Personal. 2015; 83(5):552-63. [DOI:10.1111/jopy.12131] [DOI:10.1111/jopy.12131]
25. Rashidi Fakari F, Doulabi MA, Mahmoodi Z. Predict marital satisfaction based on the variables of socioeconomic status (SES) and social support, mediated by mental health, in women of reproductive age: Path analysis model. Brain Behav. 2022; 12(3):e2482. [DOI:10.1002/brb3.2482] [DOI:10.1002/brb3.2482]
26. Bradley JM, Hojjat M. A model of resilience and marital satisfaction. J Soc Psychol. 2017; 157(5):588-601. [DOI:10.1080/00224545.2016.1254592] [DOI:10.1080/00224545.2016.1254592]
27. Esfandiari Dolabi Z, Joulaei A, Asli Azad M. Comparison of marital satisfaction and general health among breast cancer patients with breast evacuation, breast keeping and cancer-free women in Tehran. Iran J Rehabil Res Nurs. 2015; 1(4):39-48. [Link]
28. Mohlin Å, Axelsson U, Bendahl PO, Borrebaeck C, Hegardt C, Johnsson P, et al. Psychological resilience and health-related quality of life in Swedish women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cancer Manage Res. 2020; 2020:12041-51. [DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S268774] [DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S268774]
29. Foster K, Shochet I, Wurfl A, Roche M, Maybery D, Shakespeare‐Finch J, et al. On PAR: A feasibility study of the Promoting Adult Resilience program with mental health nurses. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018; 27(5):1470-80. [DOI:10.1111/inm.12447] [DOI:10.1111/inm.12447]
30. Ahmad S, Jahangir M. Resilience as predictor of marital adjustment among couples. Pak J Clin Psychol. 2020; 19(2):33-44. [Link]
31. Spanier GB. The measurement of marital quality. J Sex Marital Ther. 1979; 5(3):288-300. [DOI:10.1080/00926237908403734] [DOI:10.1080/00926237908403734]
32. Bahmani B, Nghyee M, Ghanbari Motlagh A, Khorasani B, Ehkhoda A, Ali Mohamadi F. Marital satisfaction in women with breast cancer during medical adjuvant therapy: A comparative study. Health Psychol. 2014; 3(9):1-12. [Link]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Owned by Qom University of Medical Sciences
Published by Qom University of Medical Sciences Press
eISSN: 2008-1375
pISSN: 1735-7799
Email: journal[at]muq.ac.ir
j.mua.ac[at]gmail.com
