Ethics code: IR.UMA.REC.1401.066
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hajloo N, Pourabdol S, Alizadeh H, Gharibzadeh R. Psychometric Properties of the Persian version of the Heidelberg Form for Emotion Regulation Strategies (HFERST). Qom Univ Med Sci J 2023; 17 : 2542.3
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-3632-en.html
URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-3632-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabili, Iran. , hajloo53@uma.ac.ir
2- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
3- Department of clinical Psychology, Faculty of Educational and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
4- Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
2- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
3- Department of clinical Psychology, Faculty of Educational and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
4- Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
Abstract: (2118 Views)
Background and Objectives: This study aims to measure the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Heidelberg form for emotion regulation strategies (HFERST).
Methods: In this study conducted from November to December 2022, participants were 333 people aged 18-60 years in Iran who were selected by a convenience sampling method. To evaluate the convergent and divergent validity of the Persian HFERST, the acceptance and action questionnaire-second edition, the difficulty in emotion regulation scale, and the depression, anxiety and stress scale were used. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest method. The data analysis was done in SPSSsoftware, version 25 and LISREL version 8.8.
Results: The results of confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the 8-factor solution of the questionnaire. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the subscales of rumination, reappraisal, acceptance, problem solving, suppression of emotional expression, suppression of emotional experiences, avoidance and social support were 0.88, 0.87, 0.90, 0.91, 0.84, 0.89, 0.92, and 0.90, respectively. In addition, the four-week test-retest reliability for the mentioned subscales were 0.83, 0.80, 0.85, 0.89, 0.80, 0.82, 0.86, and 0.91, respectively.
Conclusion: The Persian HFERST is a reliable and valid scale for measuring emotion regulation strategies in Iranian samples.
Methods: In this study conducted from November to December 2022, participants were 333 people aged 18-60 years in Iran who were selected by a convenience sampling method. To evaluate the convergent and divergent validity of the Persian HFERST, the acceptance and action questionnaire-second edition, the difficulty in emotion regulation scale, and the depression, anxiety and stress scale were used. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest method. The data analysis was done in SPSSsoftware, version 25 and LISREL version 8.8.
Results: The results of confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the 8-factor solution of the questionnaire. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the subscales of rumination, reappraisal, acceptance, problem solving, suppression of emotional expression, suppression of emotional experiences, avoidance and social support were 0.88, 0.87, 0.90, 0.91, 0.84, 0.89, 0.92, and 0.90, respectively. In addition, the four-week test-retest reliability for the mentioned subscales were 0.83, 0.80, 0.85, 0.89, 0.80, 0.82, 0.86, and 0.91, respectively.
Conclusion: The Persian HFERST is a reliable and valid scale for measuring emotion regulation strategies in Iranian samples.
Article number: 2542.3
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
روانشناسی
Received: 2022/12/27 | Accepted: 2023/01/15 | Published: 2023/01/1
Received: 2022/12/27 | Accepted: 2023/01/15 | Published: 2023/01/1
References
1. Agako A, Ballester P, Stead V, McCabe RE, Green SM. Measures of emotion dysregulation: A narrative review. Can Psychol. 2022; 63(3):376-91. [DOI:10.1037/cap0000307] [DOI:10.1037/cap0000307]
2. Nester MS, Brand BL, Schielke HJ, Kumar S. An examination of the relations between emotion dysregulation, dissociation, and self-injury among dissociative disorder patients. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022; 13(1):203-13. [DOI:10.1080/20008198.2022.2031592] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1080/20008198.2022.2031592]
3. Marroquín B, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Emotion regulation and depressive symptoms: Close relationships as social context and influence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015; 109(5):836-55. [DOI:10.1037/pspi0000034] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1037/pspi0000034]
4. Izadpanah S, Barnow S, Neubauer AB, Holl J. Development and validation of the heidelberg form for emotion regulation strategies (HFERST): Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Assessment. 2017; 26(5):880-906. [DOI:10.1177/1073191117720283] [PMID] [DOI:10.1177/1073191117720283]
5. Aldao A, Christensen K. Linking the expanded process model of emotion regulation to psychopathology by focusing on behavioral outcomes of regulation. Psychol Inq. 2015; 26(1):27-36. [DOI:10.1080/1047840X.2015.962399] [DOI:10.1080/1047840X.2015.962399]
6. Wang QQ, Fang YY, Huang HL, Lv WJ, Wang XX, Yang TT,et al. Anxiety, depression and cognitive emotion regulation strategies in Chinese nurses during the COVID‐19 outbreak. J Nurs Manag. 2021; 29(5):1263-74.[DOI:10.1111/jonm.13265] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1111/jonm.13265]
7. Barnow S. Emotionsregulation und psychopathologie. Psychol Rundschau. 2012; 63(2):111-124. [DOI:10.1026/0033-3042/a000119] [DOI:10.1026/0033-3042/a000119]
8. Reinecke A, Filippini N, Berna C, Western DG, Hanson B, Cooper MJ, et al. Effective emotion regulation strategies improve fMRI and ECG markers of psychopathology in panic disorder: Implications for psychological treatment action. Transl Psychiatry. 2015; 5(11): 673-93. [DOI:10.1038/tp.2015.160] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1038/tp.2015.160]
9. Eisma MC, Stroebe MS. Emotion regulatory strategies in complicated grief: A systematic review. Behav Ther. 2021; 52(1):234-49. [DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2020.04.004] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2020.04.004]
10. Garnefski N, Kraaij V. The cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric features and prospective relationships with depression and anxiety in adults. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2007; 23(3):141-49. [DOI:10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.141] [DOI:10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.141]
11. Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 85(2):348-62. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348] [PMID] [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348]
12. Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004; 26(1):41-54. [Link] [DOI:10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94]
13. Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Specificity of cognitive emotion regulation strategies: A transdiagnostic examination. Behav Res Ther. 2010; 48(10):974-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2010.06.002] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2010.06.002]
14. Zhang D, Liu S, Wu X, Tian Y. Network analysis of cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms in young adults after recent stressful events: The moderation of childhood maltreatment. J Affect Disord. 2022; 301:107-16.[DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.044] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.044]
15. Quoidbach J, Mikolajczak M, Gross JJ. Positive interventions: An emotion regulation perspective. Psychol Bull. 2015; 141(3):655-93. [DOI:10.1037/a0038648] [PMID] [DOI:10.1037/a0038648]
16. Potthoff S, Garnefski N, Miklósi M, Ubbiali A, Domínguez-Sánchez FJ, Martins EC, et al. Cognitive emotion regulation and psychopathology across cultures: A comparison between six European countries. Pers Individ Differ. 2016; 98:218-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.022] [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.022]
17. Mundfrom DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TL. Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. Int J Tes. 2005; 5(2):159-68. [DOI:10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4] [DOI:10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4]
18. Bjureberg J, Ljótsson B, Tull MT, Hedman E, Sahlin H, Lundh LG, et al. Development and validation of a brief version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale: The DERS-16. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2016; 38(2):284-96. [DOI:10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x]
19. Akbari T, Pourabdol S, Gharibzadeh R. [Psychometric properties of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale in students: DERS-16: Research report (Persian)]. Ardabili: University of Mohaghegh Ardabili; 2021.
20. Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, et al. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav. Ther. 2011; 42(4):676-88. [DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007]
21. Abasi E, Fti L, Molodi R, Zarabi H. Psychometric properties of Persian version of acceptance and action questionnaire-II. Ravesh Mod. 2012; 2(10):65-80. [Link]
22. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (dass) with the beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995; 33(3):335-43.[DOI:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U]
23. Besharat M.A. [Investigating the psychometric properties of the Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale (Persian)]. Tehran: University of Tehran; 2006.
24. Faustino B. Transdiagnostic perspective on psychological inflexibility and emotional dysregulation. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2021; 49(2):233-46. [DOI:10.1017/S1352465820000600] [PMID] [DOI:10.1017/S1352465820000600]
25. Pinna T, Edwards DJ. A systematic review of associations between interoception, vagal tone, and emotional regulation: Potential applications for mental health, wellbeing, psychological flexibility, and chronic conditions. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1792 [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01792] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01792]
26. Cai RY, Richdale AL, Dissanayake C, Trollor J, Uljarević M. Emotion regulation in autism: Reappraisal and suppression interactions. Autism. 2019; 23(3):737-49.[DOI:10.1177/1362361318774558] [PMID] [DOI:10.1177/1362361318774558]
27. Dryman MT, Heimberg RG. Emotion regulation in social anxiety and depression: A systematic review of expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018; 65:17-42. [DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2018.07.004] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2018.07.004]
28. Bodalski EA, Knouse LE, Kovalev D. Adult ADHD, emotion dysregulation, and functional outcomes: Examining the role of emotion regulation strategies. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2019; 41(1):81-92. [DOI:10.1007/s10862-018-9695-1] [DOI:10.1007/s10862-018-9695-1]
29. Prosek EA, Giordano AL, Woehler ES, Price E, McCullough R. Differences in emotion dysregulation and symptoms of depression and anxiety among illicit substance users and nonusers. Subst Use Misuse. 2018; 53(11):1915-8. [DOI:10.1080/10826084.2018.1436563] [PMID] [DOI:10.1080/10826084.2018.1436563]
30. Paulus DJ, Gallagher MW, Bartlett BA, Tran J, Vujanovic AA. The unique and interactive effects of anxiety sensitivity and emotion dysregulation in relation to posttraumatic stress, depressive, and anxiety symptoms among trauma-exposed firefighters. Compr Psychiatr. 2018; 84:54-61. [DOI:10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.03.012] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.03.012]
31. Masters MR, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ, Farrell LJ. Transactional associations between adolescents' emotion dysregulation and symptoms of social anxiety and depression: A longitudinal study. J Early Adolesc. 2019; 39(8):1085-109. [DOI:10.1177/0272431618806053] [DOI:10.1177/0272431618806053]
32. Sun J, Luo Y, Zhang R. Relationship of depression and anxiety with cognitive emotion regulation strategies among the elderly in the community. Chin Gen Pract. 2019; 22(31):3887-93. [Link]
33. Rodas JA, Jara‐Rizzo MF, Greene CM, Moreta‐Herrera R, Oleas D. Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and psychological distress during lockdown due to COVID‐19. Int J Psychol. 2022; 57(3):315-24. [DOI:10.1002/ijop.12818] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1002/ijop.12818]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Owned by Qom University of Medical Sciences
Published by Qom University of Medical Sciences Press
eISSN: 2008-1375
pISSN: 1735-7799
Email: journal[at]muq.ac.ir
j.mua.ac[at]gmail.com
